UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

 

Filed by the Registrant  ☒

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

 

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

 


 

logo01.jpg

1040 East Main StreetNOTICE OF THE
Louisville, Kentucky 40206
502.582.2571
2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

March 23, 2018

Dear Shareholder:

We invite you to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc., to be held at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, April 26, 2018, at The Olmsted, 3701 Frankfort Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky 40206. There is a map on the back cover for your reference.

The enclosed Notice and Proxy Statement contain complete information about matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting, at which we will also review Stock Yards Bancorp’s business and operations. Only shareholders of record on the record date for the meeting and their proxies are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote your shares via a toll free number or over the Internet, or by completing, signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. Instructions regarding each of the three methods of voting are contained in the Proxy Statement.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ David P. Heintzman

David P. Heintzman

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholders Meeting to Be Held on April 26, 2018: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at http://irinfo.com/sybt/sybt.html.


Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

1040 East Main Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40206

NOTICE OF THE
2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

March 23, 2018 12, 2021

 

To our Shareholders:

 

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc., a Kentucky corporation, will be held on Thursday, April 26, 201822, 2021 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, solely by remote communication in a virtual-only format.  The meeting will be accessible on the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2021The Olmsted, 3701 Frankfort Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky 40206 foritems of business to be presented at the Annual Meeting include the following purposes:proposals:

 

 

(1)

To elect twelve directors to serve until the next Annual Meetingannual meeting of Shareholdersshareholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

 

 

(2)

To approve a proposal to amendratify the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan to reserve an additional 500,000 sharesselection of CommonBKD, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. for issuance under the Plan and restrict the payment or vesting of dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested awards;year ending December 31, 2021;

 

 

(3)

To approve a non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of Stock Yards Bancorp’sBancorp’s named executive officers; and

 

 

(4)

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

 

The record date for the determination of the shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting or at any adjournment thereof is the close of business on March 5, 2018.February 26, 2021.

A list of shareholders of record as of the record date and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be made available for inspection by shareholders for any legally valid purpose related to the Annual Meeting (i) at the principal executive offices of Stock Yards Bancorp, beginning five business days prior to the meeting date and (ii) on the virtual shareholder meeting web site on the date of the meeting.

 

Your vote is important.  Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we hope you will vote as soon as possible.  Please reviewYou may vote your shares via a toll free number, over the instructions with respect toInternet, or by completing, signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided.  Instructions regarding each of yourthe three methods of voting options as describedare contained in the Proxy Statement.  The BoardI encourage you to take advantage of Directorseither the telephone or Internet voting options.  Both offer a convenient way to cast votes electronically and assure that your shares are represented at the meeting.

Thank you for your support of Stock Yards Bancorp appreciates your cooperation in directing proxies to vote at the meeting.Bancorp.  If your schedule permits, I hope you will join me atus through the meeting.live webcast.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

/s/ James A. Hillebrand

 

/s/ David P. HeintzmanJames A. Hillebrand

David P. Heintzman
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

logo02.jpg



Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.



PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
APRIL 22, 2021


 

 

WE URGE SHAREHOLDERS TO VOTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE


This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the shareholders of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

1040 East Main Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40206

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

General Information about in connection with the solicitation by its Board of Directors of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting

Why have I received these materials?

We are mailing this of Shareholders to be held by live webcast on Thursday, April 22, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. The proxies may also be voted at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement includes information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the 2021 Annual Meeting and certain other information required by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or “SEC”, and the accompanying proxyrules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. This Proxy Statement is first being mailed to shareholders on or about March 23, 2018. The proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (referred to throughout12, 2021.

Throughout this Proxy Statement, asunless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Stock Yards Bancorp”, “Bancorp”, “the Company”, “we”, “us” or “we” or “our”) in connection with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders that will take place on Thursday, April 26, 2018. We invite you all refer to attend the Annual Meeting and request you to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

What am I voting on?

Electing twelve directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their respective successors are duly elected;

Amending our 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (referred to throughout this Proxy Statement as the “2015 Plan”) to reserve an additional 500,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the Plan and restrict the payment or vesting of dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested awards; and

Approving a non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

Where can I find more information about these voting matters?

Information about the nominees for election as directors is contained in Item 1;

Information about the proposed amendments to the 2015 Plan is contained in Item 2; and

Information about the non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of Stock Yards Bancorp’s named executive officers is contained in Item 3.

What is the relationship of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company?

Stock Yards Bancorp is the holding company forits direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company, (referredwhich we refer to throughoutin this Proxy Statement as “the Bank”). Stock Yards Bancorp owns 100% of Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company. Because Stock Yards Bancorp has no significant operations of its own, its business and that of Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company are essentially the same.

 

ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

Our 2021 Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual-only format via a live webcast. There will be no physical location for the Annual Meeting, and you will not be able to attend in person. You will be able to attend the meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit questions either before or during the meeting by following the information below.

To attend the Annual Meeting online, simply visit the virtual meeting web site at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2021. In order to be admitted to the meeting, you will need to enter the 16-digit control number found on your proxy card, voting instruction form or email notice included with your proxy materials. After logging into the meeting platform, you will be able to vote your shares electronically if you have not already done so.

The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on April 22, 2021. Online registration will begin 15 minutes prior to the start time of the meeting, and you should allow sufficient time to complete the login process. Technical support numbers will be available on the meeting site web site if you have questions about the online format or experience difficulties accessing the online web portal for the meeting.

The online meeting format will provide the same opportunities for shareholder participation as an in-person meeting, including the ability to submit questions either before or during the meeting. Please refer to the section of this Proxy Statement captioned “General Information About the Annual Meeting – Virtual Meeting Information” beginning on page 2 for additional information about the virtual meeting format, including instructions for accessing the online meeting site, voting and submitting questions. If you are unable to attend, a replay of the webcast will be available on the virtual meeting web site within 24 hours following the meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholders Meeting to Be Held on April 22, 2021: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com and on the investor relations page of the Company’s web site at https://stockyardsbancorp.q4ir.com.

1

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Proxy Materials

Why have I received these materials?

We are mailing these proxy materials to you in connection with our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Thursday, April 22, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. As a shareholder, you are invited to participate in the meeting via live webcast and vote on the matters described in this Proxy Statement.

What is included in the proxy materials?

These proxy materials include:

The Notice of the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

This Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting; and

Our 2020 Summary Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

What is a proxy?

We are soliciting your proxy to vote the shares of the Company’s common stock that you own at the Annual Meeting. A proxy is your designation of another person to vote stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document is also called a proxy or a proxy card. When you designate a proxy, you may also direct the proxy how to vote your shares. James A. Hillebrand, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Philip S. Poindexter, the Company’s President, have been designated as the proxies to cast the votes of Bancorp’s shareholders at the Annual Meeting. The proxies will vote your shares according to the instructions you provide on the proxy card or by telephone or over the Internet.

Voting Information

What am I voting on?

Electing ten directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

Ratifying the selection of BKD, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2021; and

Approving a non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

Where can I find more information about these voting matters?

Information about the nominees for election as directors is contained in Item 1 beginning on page 11;

Information about the ratification of the selection of BKD, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm is contained in Item 2 on page 15; and

Information about the non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of Stock Yards Bancorp’s named executive officers is contained in Item 3 beginning on page 15.

2

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

 

Holders of record of Common Stock (“Common Stock”) of Stock Yards Bancorp as of the close of business on March 5, 2018February 26, 2021 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On March 5, 2018,February 26, 2021, there were 22,715,32222,732,976 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to one vote on all matters presented for vote at the Annual Meeting.


 

How do I vote my shares?shares without participating in the Annual Meeting?

 

If you are a “record” shareholder of Common Stock (that is, if you hold Common Stock in your own name in Stock Yards Bancorp’sBancorp’s stock records maintained by our transfer agent), you may vote your shares without participating in the Annual Meeting by using one of the following three options.options:

By Internet - Go towww.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 21, 2021 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 19, 2021 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to create an electronic voting instruction form.

By Telephone – 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 21, 2021 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 19, 2021 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

 

By Internet – If you have Internet access, we encourage you to vote on www.proxyvote.com by following instructions on the proxy card;Mail

 

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and either return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

By Telephone – By making a toll-free telephone call from the U.S. or Canada to 1(800) 690-6903; or

 

Can I vote my shares during the meeting?

You may vote online during the meeting by logging into the virtual meeting web site with the 16-digit control number found on your proxy card, voting instruction form or email notice included with your proxy materials and following the on-screen instructions. You may also continue to vote your shares by mail, telephone or internet prior to the virtual meeting by following the voting instructions included in your proxy materials. If you have already voted using one of these methods you do not need to vote again at the meeting unless you wish to change your vote or revoke a previous proxy.

If my shares are held by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?

By Mail – You can vote by completing, signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.

 

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record (that is, in “street name”), you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares. This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card provided by them or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or over the Internet. Beneficial owners who wish to vote attheir shares electronically during the Annual Meeting will need to obtain amay do so by following the instructions from their broker that accompany their proxy form frommaterials.

Who votes the institution that holds your shares and to follow the voting instructions on such form.held in my Stock Yards KSOP account?

 

If you are a participant in the Stock Yards Bank & TrustTrust Company 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“KSOP”), you have the option of receiving your voting information either electronically or by regular postal mail. Plan participants who have elected to receive their voting information electronically should follow the instructions contained in the electronic communication. If you have not affirmatively elected to receive voting information for your KSOP shares electronically, you will receive a paper version of the proxy card via postal mail that will include the shares you own through that savings plan.your KSOP account. That proxy card will serve as a voting instruction card for the trustee of the plan. If you own shares through the plan and do not vote electronically or by mail, the plan trustee will be instructed by the plan’s administrative committee to vote the plan shares as the Board of Directors recommend.

3

 

What if I return my proxy card but do not provide voting instructions?

 

If you vote by proxy card, your shares will be voted as you instruct. If you return your proxy card but do not mark your voting instructions on your signed card, Mr. Heintzman,James A. Hillebrand, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. James A. Hillebrand,Philip S. Poindexter, President, as proxies named on the proxy card, will vote your shares FOR the election of the twelveten director nominees, FOR the approvalratification of the amendments to the 2015 PlanBKD, LLP and FOR the approval of the compensation of the named executive officers.

 

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

 

Yes. You may change your vote at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. You may do this by:

 

 

Signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it to us prior to the Annual Meeting;

 

 

Voting again by telephone or through the Internet prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 25, 2018;21, 2021;

 

 

Giving written notice of revocation to theour Corporate Secretary of the Companyat 1040 East Main Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40206, prior to the Annual Meeting; or

 

 

Voting again atelectronically during the Annual Meeting.

 

Your attendance atparticipation in the Annual Meeting will not have the effect of revoking a proxy unless you notify our Corporate Secretary in writing before the polls close that you wish to revoke a previouspreviously submitted proxy.

 

What is a broker non-vote?

 

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have the discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote”.non-vote.” In these cases the broker can register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) that govern brokers.

 


If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, your broker has discretionary voting authority to vote your shares on the ratification of BKD, LLP (Item 2) even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors (Item 1), the approval of the amendments to the 2015 Plan (Item 2) or the approval of executive compensation (Item 3) without instructions from you, in which case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these matters.

 

What constitutes a quorum for purposes of the Annual Meeting?

 

The presence at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxyHolders of a majority of the holders of more than 50 percent of the voting power of all outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote shall constitute a quorumat the Annual Meeting must be present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy for the transaction of business. This is called a quorum. Proxies marked as abstaining (including proxies containing broker non-votes) on any matter to be acted upon by shareholders will be treated as present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum but will not be counted as votes cast on such matters. If a quorum is not present, we may propose to adjourn the meeting to solicit additional proxies and reconvene the meeting at a later date.

4

 

What vote is required to approve each item?

 

You may vote “FOR” each nominee for director or “AGAINST” each nominee, or “ABSTAIN” from voting on one or more nominees. Unless you mark “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to a particular nominee or nominees or for all nominees, your proxy will be voted “FOR” each of the director nominees named in this Proxy Statement. A nominee will be elected as a director if the number of “FOR” votes exceeds the number of “AGAINST” votes.

 

The proposal to amendselection of the 2015 Planindependent registered public accounting firm will passbe ratified if a majority ofthe votes cast onfor it exceed the proposal arevotes cast for approval of the amendment.against it.

 

The proposal to approve the compensation of our named executive officers disclosed in this Proxy Statement will pass if votes cast for it exceed votes cast against it. Because this vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon Bancorp or the Board of Directors.

 

Any other item to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting will pass if votes cast for it exceed votes cast against it.

 

What happens if the Annual Meeting is adjourned or postponed?

Your proxy will still be effective and will be voted at the rescheduled meeting in the same manner as it would have been voted at the originally scheduled meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.

Who counts the votes?

 

Broadridge Financial Solutions will count votes cast by proxy at the Annual Meeting. They will also certify the results of the voting and will also determine whether a quorum is present at the meeting. Any votes cast in person atelectronically during the Annual Meeting will be included in the final voting tally.

 

How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

 

You may abstain from voting on one or more nominees for director. You may also abstain from voting on any or all other proposals. Abstentions will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but will not be counted in the number of votes cast for or against any nominee or with respect to any other matter. If a broker does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner of shares on a particular matter and indicates on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote on that matter, we will treat these shares as present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum but the shares will not count as votes cast on the matter. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

What information do I need to attend the Annual Meeting?

We do not use tickets for admission to the Annual Meeting. If you are voting in person, we may ask for photo identification.


 

How does the Board recommend that I vote my shares?

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees for director set forth in this document, Proxy Statement, FOR the approvalratification of the amendments toselection of the 2015 Planindependent registered accounting firm and FOR the approval of the compensation of the named executive officers.

 

With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion in the best interests of Stock Yards Bancorp. At the date this Proxy Statement went to press, the Board of Directors had no knowledge of any business other than that described herein that would be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting.

 

Who will bear the expense of soliciting proxies?

 

Stock Yards Bancorp will bear the cost of soliciting proxies in the form enclosed. In addition to the solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone, facsimile or electronic transmission by our employees. We reimburse brokers holding Common Stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of such Common Stock. The Company has engaged the services of Laurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC., a professional proxy solicitation firm, to aid in the solicitation of proxies from certain brokers, bank nominees and other institutional owners. The Company’sCompany’s costs for such services will not exceed $7,500 plus reasonable out of pocket expenses.

5

How can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

Virtual Meeting Information

How do I participate in the meeting?

To participate in the virtual meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2021 and enter the 16-digit control number included on your proxy card, voting instruction form or email notice that accompanied your proxy materials. You may log into the meeting platform beginning at 9:45 a.m., Eastern Time, on April 22, 2021. The live audio webcast will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. We encourage shareholders to access the virtual meeting web site prior to the start of the meeting and to allow sufficient time to complete the online registration process.

What are the technical requirements for accessing the online meeting site?

The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Internet Explorer, Edge, Firefox, Chrome and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets and cell phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Participants should ensure that they have a strong Internet connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. Participants should also give themselves ample time to log in and ensure that they can hear streaming audio prior to the start of the meeting.

Will I have an opportunity to submit a question?

Yes, shareholders will have the opportunity to submit questions if they choose. If you wish to submit a question, you may do so in two ways. If you want to ask a question before the meeting, you may log into www.proxyvote.com and enter your 16-digit control number. Next, click on "Question for Management," type in your question and click "Submit." Alternatively, if you want to submit your question during the meeting, log into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2021, click the Q&A button to open the question panel, type your question into the field titled “Submit a Question” and click "Submit.” Questions and answers will be grouped by topic and substantially similar questions will be grouped and answered together.

Questions pertinent to meeting matters will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints. Shareholders should refer to the Rules of Conduct and Procedures for the meeting that will be posted on the virtual meeting web site for guidelines regarding the submission of questions, including certain topics and subject matter that we will consider inappropriate for purposes of the meeting. Any questions pertinent to meeting matters that cannot be answered during the meeting due to time constraints will be posted online and answered at www.syb.com. The questions and answers will be available as soon as practical after the meeting and will remain available until one week after posting.

What if I have lost or misplaced my 16-digit control number?

If you no longer have your control number or were not a shareholder on February 26, 2021, you may still enter the meeting as a guest in listen-only mode. To access the meeting as a guest, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2021 and enter the requested information on the welcome screen. However, if you attend the meeting as a guest, you will not have the ability to vote or submit questions.

What if I experience technical difficulties accessing the meeting?

If you encounter any technical difficulties with the virtual meeting platform, please use the telephone numbers listed on the meeting web site prior to the start of the meeting and technicians will be available to assist you.

6

What will happen if we experience technical problems during the meeting webcast?

In the event of technical difficulties or interruptions with the Annual Meeting, we expect that an announcement will be made on the meeting website, www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2021. If necessary, the announcement will provide updated information regarding the date, time and location of the Annual Meeting. Any updated information regarding the Annual Meeting will also be posted to the investor relations page on our website, www.syb.com.

Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations

 

Is there any information that I should know about future annual meetings?

 

Any shareholder who intends to present a proposal at the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must deliver the proposal to the Corporate Secretary at 1040 East Main Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40206 no later than November 23, 2018,12, 2021 if the proposal is submitted for inclusion in our proxy materials for that meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, our Bylaws impose certain advance notice requirements on a shareholder nominating a director or submitting a proposal to an Annual Meeting. Such notice must be submitted to the Secretary of Stock Yards Bancorp no later than January 25, 2019.21, 2022. The notice must contain information prescribed by the Bylaws, copies of which are available from the Secretary. These requirements apply even if the shareholder does not desire to have his or her nomination or proposal included in our Proxy Statement.

 

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS

 

Role of the Board and Governance Principles

 

The Stock Yards Bancorp’s Board of Directors represents shareholders’ interests in perpetuating a successful business including optimizing shareholder returns. The Directors are responsible for determining that the Company is managed to ensure this result. This is an active responsibility, and the Board monitors the effectiveness of policies and decisions including the execution of the Company’s business strategies. Strong corporate governance guidelines form the foundation for Board practices. As a part of this foundation, the Board believes that high ethical standards in all Company matters are essential to earning the confidence of investors, customers, employees and vendors. Accordingly, Stock Yards Bancorp has established a framework that exercises appropriate measures of oversight at all levels of the Company and clearly communicates that the Board expects all actions be consistent with its fundamental principles of business ethics and other corporate governance guidelines. The Company’s governance guidelines and other related matters are published on the CompanyCompany’s website: www.syb.com under the Investor Relations tab.section.

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

The Board of Directors modified the Company’s leadership structure during 2018 in connection with the retirement of David P. Heintzman as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Heintzman had previously held the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. He retired as Chief Executive Officer effective September 30, 2018, and James A. Hillebrand, previously President of the Company, was appointed to succeed Mr. Heintzman as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Heintzman remained employed in the role of Executive Chairman until his retirement from the Company at the end of 2018. Thereafter, Mr. Heintzman continued to lead the Board as non-executive Chairman.

During 2020, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in consultation with Mr. Heintzman, reviewed the leadership structure of the Board and decided that the interests of the Company’s shareholders would be best served by again combining the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Based upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and noting the successful executive management transition process following Mr. Heintzman’s retirement and strong leadership skills demonstrated by Mr. Hillebrand following his promotion to Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors voted to appoint Mr. Hillebrand to the additional position of Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2021.

7

The Board of Directors believes that the most effective leadership structure for the Company at the present time is a combinedto combine the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer position filled byOfficer. Mr. Heintzman. HeHillebrand has a long history of service in various management capacities with the Bank, is the director mostvery familiar with theits business, of the Companyits customers and the banking industry generally, and the community bank model in particular. The Board believes that he is best suitedhighly qualified to lead discussions on important strategic and operational issues affecting the Bank and Bancorp. Combining the Chief Executive OfficerOffice and Chairman positions creates a firm link between management and the Board and promotes development and implementation of corporate strategy. AsThe Board also believes that the industry knowledge and experience provided by Mr. Hillebrand as our Chief Executive Officer, together with our strong lead independent director, Stephen M. Priebe, and our experienced committee chairs and other directors, will enable the Company to continue to meet the expectations of our shareholders and provide strong independent oversight from our directors.

The Company’s corporate governance documents address the leadership structure of the Board and the respective roles of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer. The Board will annually elect one of its members to serve as Chairman of the Board. The Chairman will preside at all meetings of the shareholders and of the Board of Directors, and generally consult with the Board on matters pertaining to the Company’s business and affairs. Both positions may, but need not, be held by the same person. The decision as to whether the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be combined or separated will be made from time to time by the Board of Directors at its discretion. The Board’s decision will be made in its business judgment and based upon its consideration of all relevant factors and circumstances at the time, including the specific needs of the Company’s business and the current composition of the Board.

If the individual elected as Chairman of the Board is committed to strong corporate governance practices,also the Chief Executive Officer, or if the Chairman of the Board has designatedis not an independent director, the Board will elect a lead independent director. director to help ensure strong independent leadership on the Board.

In addition to an independent lead director, three committees of the Board provide independent oversight of management – the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each is composed entirely of independent directors.

 


TheIf a lead independent director is called for under the Company’s governance documents, the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (currently Charles R. Edinger III) acts in that role. Stephen M. Priebe currently serves as lead director because Mr. Hillebrand, as the rolecurrent Chief Executive Officer of lead director.the Company, does not qualify as an independent director under the Board’s independence standards. The lead director presides at executive sessions of the Board which consist of independent and non-management directors and are held at least fourtwo times annually. He has authority to call special meetings of the independent directors and committees of the Board, serves as liaison between the ChairmanChief Executive Officer and board members and is available to discuss with any director concerns he or she may have regarding the Board, the Company or the management team. The lead independent director is responsible for providing advice and consultation to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and informing him of decisions reached and suggestions made during executive sessions of the Board of Directors. The lead director reviews and approves matters such as agendas and schedules for Board meetings and executive sessions, and information distributed to board members. The lead director will be available to consult and communicate with shareholders where appropriate.

 

Board Evaluation Process

 

The Board conducts an annual self-assessment to enhance its effectiveness. Through regular evaluation of its policies, practices and procedures, the Board identifies areas for further consideration and improvement. The evaluation process is led by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each year, that Committee discusses and decides upon the process to be followed for the upcoming year. Each director ismay be requested to complete a questionnaire and provide feedback on a range of issues, including his or her assessment of the Board’sBoard’s overall effectiveness and performance; its committee structure; priorities for future Board discussion and attention; the composition of the Board and the background and skills of its members; the quality, timing and relevance of information received from management; and the nature and scope of agenda items.items; and his or her individual contributions to the Board. The lead director then meets with each director individually either to discuss his or her questionnaire responses and any otheror, if directors were not requested to complete a questionnaire, to discuss thoughts orand suggestions the director may have regarding the Board’s overall effectiveness or specific Board practices or policies. The lead director prepares a summary of findings drawn from the questionnaire responses and director interviews for presentation to the full Board of Directors. Each of the Committees also conducts their own self-assessments led by the respective committee chairs.

8

 

Board Oversight of Risk Management

 

The Board of Directors has a significant role in the oversight of risk management. The Board receives information regarding risks facing the Company, their relative magnitude and management’s plan for mitigating these risks. Primary risks facing the Company are credit, operational, cybersecurity and informational security, interest rate, liquidity, compliance/legal, strategic and reputational risks. After assessment by management, reports are made to committees of the Board. Credit risk is addressed by the Bank’s Risk Committee.Committee of Bancorp. Operational and compliance/legal risks are addressed by the Audit Committee of Bancorp and the Bank’s Risk Committee.Committee of Bancorp. Cybersecurity and informational security risks are addressed by the Risk Committee of Bancorp. Interest rate and liquidity risks are addressed by the Asset/Liability Committee comprised of Bank management and reports are made monthly to the Board.Board at each of its regular meetings. Strategic and reputational risk is addressed by the above committees in addition to the Compensation Committee of Bancorp along with other executive compensation matters. Oversight of the trust department is addressed by the Trust Committee of the Bank. Corporate governance matters are addressed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp. The full Board hearsreceives reports from each of these committees at the Board meeting immediately following the Committee meeting. The Bank’s Director of Internal Audit has a direct reporting line to the Audit Committee of the Board. The Chief Risk Officer, Information Security Officer and Compliance Officer make regular reports to the Audit and Risk Committees and the full Board when appropriate. During 2016, the Risk Committee assumed oversight responsibility for a broader range of enterprise-related risks within the Bank and has become the primary board level committee focused on risk management and related policies and processes.

 

Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors

 

Shareholders may communicate directly to the Board of Directors in writing by sending a letter to the Board at: Stock Yards Bancorp Board of Directors, P.O. Box 32890, Louisville, KY 40232-2890.  Communications directed to the Board of Directors will be received by the Chairman and processed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee when the communications concern matters related to the duties and responsibilities of the Board of Directors.


 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

 

During 2017,2020, the Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp held thirteennine regularly scheduled meetings. All directors of Stock Yards Bancorp are also directors of the Bank. During 2017,2020, the Bank’s Board of Directors also held thirteennine regularly scheduled meetings.

 

All directors attended at least 75% of the number of meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which they served that were held during the period he or she served as a director. All directors are encouraged to attend annual meetings of shareholders, and ten of elevenall attended the 20172020 Annual Meeting.

 

Stock Yards Bancorp hasmaintains an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Risk Committee of the Board of Directors. The Bank has a Risk Committee andmaintains a Trust Committee of the Board of Directors.

 

Audit Committee

 

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains an Audit Committee comprised of directors who are not officers of Stock Yards Bancorp. For 2017,2020, the Audit Committee was comprised of Messrs. Herde (Chairman), Lechleiter and Priebe and Ms. Heitzman.Schutte. Each of these individuals meets the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and NASDAQ independence requirements for membership on an audit committee and each is financially literate within the meaning of the NASDAQ listing rules. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, and this charter is available on Stock Yards Bancorp’s website: www.syb.com.www.syb.com.

9

 

The Audit Committee oversees Stock Yards Bancorp’sBancorp’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee, among other things,matters, considers the appointment of the external auditors for Stock Yards Bancorp, reviews with the auditors the plan and scope of the audit and audit fees, monitors the adequacy of reporting and internal controls, meets regularly with internal and external auditors, reviews the independence of the external auditors, reviews Stock Yards Bancorp’s financial results as reported in Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC filings, and approves all audit and permitted non-audit services performed by its external auditors. The Committee reviews and evaluates identified related party transactions and discusses with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures. The Audit Committee meets with our management at least quarterly to consider the adequacy of our internal controls and the objectivity of our financial reporting. This Committee also meets with the external auditors and with our internal auditors regarding these matters. Both the independent auditors and the internal auditors regularly meet privately with this Committee and have unrestricted access to this Committee. The Audit Committee held five meetings during 2017.2020.

 

The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Herde and Lechleiter and Ms. Heitzman are audit committee financial experts for Stock Yards Bancorp and are independent as described in the paragraph above. See “REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE” for more information.

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Members of this Committee are Messrs. Priebe (Chairman), Brown Edinger (Chairman) and Northern,Herde, all of whom are non-employee directors meeting the NASDAQ independence requirements for membership on a nominating and governance committee. Responsibilities of the Committee are set forth in a written charter satisfying the NASDAQ’s corporate governance standards, requirements of federal securities law and incorporating other best practices.  The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and this charter is available on Stock Yards Bancorp’s website: www.syb.com.www.syb.com.

 

Among the Committee’sCommittee’s duties are identifying and evaluating candidates for election to the Board of Directors, including consideration of candidates suggested by shareholders. To submit a candidate for consideration by the Committee, a shareholder must provide written communication to the Committee. The Committee would apply the same board membership criteria to shareholder-nominated candidates as it would to Committee-nominated candidates. The Committee also assists the Board in determining the composition of Board committees, assessing the Board’s effectiveness and developing and implementing the Company’s corporate governance guidelines. This Committee held three meetings during 2017.2020.


 

Compensation Committee

 

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains a Compensation Committee. Members of this Committee are Messrs. Edinger, Lechleiter (Chairman), Priebe, Schutte and Tasman, all of whom meet the NASDAQ independence requirements for membership on the Compensation Committee. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, and this charter is available on Stock Yards Bancorp’s website: www.syb.com.www.syb.com. The responsibilities of this Committee include oversight of executive and Board compensation and related programs. The Compensation Committee held sixeight meetings during 2017.2020. See “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION - REPORT“REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” for more information.

 

Risk Committee

 

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards BankBancorp maintains a Risk Committee. This Committee is responsible for monitoring the Bank’s commercial and consumer loan portfolio and the related credit risk. The Committee reviews and discusses with management its assessment of asset quality and trends in asset quality, credit quality administration and underwriting standards and the effectiveness of portfolio risk management systems. The Committee is also responsible for reviewing and approving significant lending and credit policies and compliance with those policies. During 2016,Additionally, the Risk Committee significantly expanded its duties to includehas oversight responsibility for a widerwide range of enterprise-related risks within the Bank, including regulatory compliance, information security, cybersecurity, insurance and physical security. Members of this Committee are Messrs. Tasman (Chairman), Bickel, Edinger, Northern (Chairman)Heintzman and Tasman.Ms. Heitzman. The Risk Committee held twelveseven regular meetings in 2017.2020.

 

Trust Committee

 

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bank maintains a Trust Committee. The members of the Bank’s Trust Committee are Ms. Heitzman (Chair) and Messrs. Bickel, Brown Herde and Priebe and Ms. Heitzman. This Committee held six meetings in 2017.Heintzman. The Trust Committee oversees the operations of the wealth management and trust department of the Bank to help ensure it operates in accordance with sound fiduciary principles and is in compliance with pertinent laws and regulations. This Committee held six meetings in 2020.

 

10

 

ITEM 1. ELECTIONELECTION OF TWELVETEN DIRECTORS

 

The Board of Directors presently consists of twelveeleven members. One current director, Norman Tasman, will reach his mandatory retirement age before the date of the 2021 Annual Meeting and will not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Directors serve a one-year term and hold office until the Annual Meeting following the year of their election and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, subject to his or her death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification.

 

The twelveBoard of Directors has fixed the number of directors to be elected at the 2021 Annual Meeting at ten. The ten directors nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors for election this year to hold office until the 20192022 Annual Meeting and until their respective successors are elected and qualified are:are identified below. Subject to completion of its proposed merger transaction with Kentucky Bancshares, Inc., we intend to expand the size of the Board concurrent with the closing of the transaction to twelve directors and add two existing members of the Kentucky Bancshares board of directors to our Board.

 

Name, Age and Year

Individual Became Director (1)

 

Principal Occupation;

Certain Directorships (2) (3)

   

Paul J. Bickel III

Age 65

Director since 2017

 

President, U.S. Specialties

Age 62

Director since 2017

   

J. McCauley Brown

Age 68

Director since 2015

 

Retired Vice President, Brown-Forman Corporation

Age 65

Director since 2015


Name, Age and Year

Individual Became Director (1)

Principal Occupation;

Certain Directorships (2) (3)

Charles R. Edinger III

President, J. Edinger & Son, Inc.

Age 68

Director since 1984

   

David P. Heintzman(4)

Age 61

Director since 1992

 

Former Chairman of the Boards and Retired Chief Executive Officer,,

Age 58Stock Yards Bancorp,, Inc. and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company

Director since 1992

   

Donna L. Heitzman (4)

Age 68

Director since 2016

 

Retired Portfolio Manager,

Age 65

KKR Prisma Capital

Director since 2016

   

Carl G. Herde

Vice President/Finance,

Age 5760

Kentucky Hospital Association

Director since 2005

 

Vice President/Financial Policy,

Kentucky Hospital Association

   

James A. Hillebrand

President,

Age 4952

Director since 2008

 

Chairman of the Boards and Chief Executive Officer,

Stock Yards Bancorp,, Inc. and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company

Director since 2008

   

Richard A. Lechleiter(3)

Age 62

Director since 2007

 

President, Catholic Education Foundation of Louisville

Age 59

Director since 2007

Richard Northern

Partner, Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs LLP

Age 69

Director since 2011

   

Stephen M. Priebe

Age 57

Director since 2012

 

President, Hall Contracting of Kentucky

11

Name, Age 54and Year

Individual Became Director (1)

 

Director since 2012Principal Occupation;

Certain Directorships (2) (3)

   

Norman TasmanJohn L. Schutte

Age 57

Director since 2018

 

President, Tasman Industries,Chief Executive Officer,

GeriMed, Inc. and

Age 66

Tasman Hide Processing, Inc.

Director since 1995

   

Kathy C. Thompson

Age 59

Director since 1994

 

Senior Executive Vice President,, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

Age 56

and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company,, Manager of

Director since 1994

the Bank’sBank’s Wealth Management and Trust Department

 

(1)

Ages listed are as of December 31, 2017.2020.

(2)

Each nominee has been engaged in his or her chief occupation for five years or more with the exception of Messrs. Brown,Heintzman, Herde and LechleiterHillebrand and Ms. Heitzman as described below.

(3)

Mr. Lechleiter is a director of Amedisys, Inc., a publicly-traded healthcare services company. No other nominee holds, or at any time in the last five years has held, any directorship in a company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, other than Stock Yards Bancorp.

(4)

There is no family relationship between Mr. Heintzman and Ms. Heitzman.


 

Our Board of Directors, through a process managed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, conducts an annual review of director independence. During this review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company. The purpose of this review is to determine whether any such relationships or transactions are inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

 

As a result of this review, and based upon the advice and recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Bickel, Brown, Edinger, Herde, Lechleiter, Northern, Priebe and TasmanSchutte and Ms. Heitzman satisfy the independence requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Mr. Heintzman served as an executive officer of the Bank until December 31, 2018 and does not satisfy these requirements. As current employees of the Bank, Messrs. Heintzman andMr. Hillebrand and Ms. Thompson also do not satisfy these requirements. The Board of Directors also previously determined that Mr. Tasman satisfied the NASDAQ independence requirements during his most recent year of service as a director prior to retirement.

 

In performing its independence review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee noted that the Bank has a business relationship with Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, of which Mr. Northern is a partner. Additionally, the Committee noted that the Bank and Mr. Heintzman have in the past made charitable donations to the Catholic Education Foundation of Louisville, of which Mr. Lechleiter is the President. However, in all cases, the Committee determined that these relationships were not material to the director or his affiliated company or organization.

 

Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws require majority voting for the election of directors in uncontested elections. This means that the director nominees in an uncontested election for directors must receive a number of votes cast “for” his or her election that exceeds the number of votes cast “against.” The Company’sCompany’s corporate governance guidelines further provide that any incumbent director who does not receive a majority of “for” votes in an uncontested election must, within five days following the certification of the election results, tender to the Chairman of the Board his or her resignation from the Board. The resignation will specify that it is effective upon the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. The Board will, through a process managed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and excluding the nominee in question, accept or reject the resignation within 90 days after certification of the shareholder vote. The Board will promptly communicate any action taken on the resignation.

12

 

Additional Information Regarding the Background and Qualifications of Director Nominees

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the particular experience, qualifications, attributes and expertise of each nominee for election to the Board. Having directors with different points of view, professional experience, education and skills provides broader perspectives and more diverse considerations valuable to the directors as they fulfill their leadership roles. Potential Board candidates are evaluated based upon various criteria, including:

 

DirectDirect industry knowledge, broad-based business experience, or professional skills that indicate the candidate will make a significant and immediate contribution to the Board’s discussion and decision-making in the array of complex issues facing Bancorp;

BehaviorBehavior and reputation that indicate he or she is committed to the highest ethical standards and the values of Bancorp;

SpecialSpecial skills, expertise, and background that add to and complement the range of skills, expertise, and background of the existing directors;

TheThe ability to contribute to broad Board responsibilities, including succession planning, management development, and strategic planning; and

ConfidenceConfidence that the candidate will effectively, consistently, and appropriately take into account and balance the legitimate interests and concerns of all Bancorp’s shareholders in reaching decisions.

 

Directors must have time available to devote to Board activities and to enhance their knowledge of Stock Yards Bancorp Inc. and the banking industry.

 


The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engages in regular discussions of board and director succession matters, including plans for identifying potential candidates to fill positions vacated by retiring directors. Several of our existing directors will reach our mandatory retirement age over the course of the next few years. As the Committee seeks to identify qualified individuals to fill those vacancies and considers the overall composition of the Board, the Committee is committed to broadening the diversity of our Board and expects to actively consider race and ethnicity as additional factors in the evaluation of its potential director candidates.

 

All non-management directorsdirectors are required to own stockCommon Stock equal in value to at least $200,000 within three years of joining the Board and to maintain that minimum ownership level for the remainder of their service as a director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may exercise its discretion in enforcing the guidelines when the accumulation of Common Stock is affected by the price of Bancorp stock or changes in director compensation. Management directors also have ownership targets as set forth elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. All directors’ ownership positions meet or exceed the requirement, and some of the more tenured directors are among the Company’s largest shareholders.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors has presented a slate of twelveten nominees for election as directors at the 20182021 Annual Meeting. If elected, we expect that all of the aforementioned nominees will serve as directors and hold office until the 20192022 annual meeting of shareholders and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. However, if for any reason a nominee should become unable or unwilling to serve, proxies may be voted for another person nominated as a substitute by the Board of Directors, or the Board may reduce the number of directors to be elected.

 

All twelveten nominees are standing for re-election and were last elected to the Board of Directors by shareholders at the 20172020 Annual Meeting except Mr. Bickel, who was first appointed in December 2017 and will be standing for election by shareholders for the first time.Meeting. Below is a summary of the Committee’s consideration and evaluation of each director nominee.

 

Mr. Bickel is founder and President of U.S. Specialties, a commercial building supply company. He has served as the managing member of several real estate development organizations in the Louisville area over the past 30 years. Outside of commercial endeavors, Mr. Bickel has been very active in the Louisville community, serving in a leadership capacity on numerous area non-profit boards. Mr. Bickel serves on the Bank’s Risk Committee of Bancorp and the Bank’s Trust Committee.

 

Mr. Brown retired as a Vice President of Brown-Forman Corporation, a Fortune 1,000 company, in 2015. His extensive experience in business, management and accounting, and his deep ties to the Louisville community, bring valuable local and global perspectives to our Board. Additionally, his widespread commitment to community organizations in Louisville and beyond gives him a strong sense of the needs, prospects and potential of our region. Mr. Brown serves on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp and the Bank’s Trust Committee.

13

 

Mr. EdingerHeintzman is President of J. Edinger & Son, Inc., a family owned business, which is typical of the Bank’s historical customer base. He brings this perspective to the Board, and he has the skills necessary to serve retired as lead director. Mr. Edinger is a long-serving member of the Board with a deep understanding of the role of the Board and of the Company and its operations. He chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp, and he serves on the Compensation CommitteeChief Executive Officer of Bancorp and the Bank’s Risk Committee.

Bank as of September 30, 2018. From October 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, he held the position of Executive Chairman. He continued to serve as non-executive Chairman of the Boards of Bancorp and the Bank until January 1, 2021. Mr. Heintzman holds an accounting degree, and prior to joining the Bank, worked as a certified public accountant for an international accounting firm. He joined the Bank in 1985 and, has servedprior to his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, held a series of executive positions, including Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and President. In January 2005, he assumed the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Heintzman has beenwas instrumental in the Bank’s growth strategies and profitable execution. His commitment to ethical standards setsset the example for the Bank and its employees, and his tenure and experience in all areas of the business provide a unique perspective of the business and strategic direction of the Company. Mr. Heintzman serves on the Risk Committee of Bancorp and the Bank’s Trust Committee.

 

Ms. Heitzman, CPA, CFA,Certified Public Accountant, Chartered Financial Analyst, with expertise in the institutional credit markets and experience with investment strategies, provides our Board with a deep knowledge and understanding of capital markets, finance and accounting. Ms. Heitzman recently retired in 2016 as a portfolio manager for New York City-basedCity based KKR Prisma Capital. She joined that company in 2004 to help construct and manage customized portfolios. Before joining KKR Prisma, Ms. Heitzman served in various capacities at AEGON USA, previously Providian Capital. As a portfolio manager in capital market strategies, she facilitated significant growth and broad diversification of a $1 billion fund portfolio. Ms. Heitzman serves on the AuditRisk Committee of Bancorp and has been designated bychairs the Board of Directors as an audit committee financial expert. She also serves on the Bank'sBank’s Trust Committee.


 

Mr. Herde holds an accounting degree, is a certified public accountantCertified Public Accountant and joined Baptist Healthcare System, Inc., one of the largest not-for-profit health care systems in Kentucky, in 1984 as controller.  He served as the Chief Financial Officer from 1993 until his retirement from Baptist in September 2016.  He now serves as the Vice President of FinancePresident/Financial Policy for the Kentucky Hospital Association.  He has extensive experience in financial reporting and corporate finance.  Mr. Herde chairs the Audit Committee of Bancorp and has been designated by the Board of Directors as an audit committee financial expert. He also serves on the Bank’s Trust Committee.Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp.

 

Mr. Hillebrandwas appointed Chief Executive Officer of Bancorp and the Bank effective October 1, 2018, and assumed the additional roles of Chairman of the Boards of each company effective January 1, 2021. He joined Stock Yards Bank in 1996 as director and developer of the private banking group. Prior to joining the Bank, he was with a regional bank and a community bank where he specialized in private banking. He has directed the expansion of the Bank into the Indianapolis and Cincinnati markets and was named President in 2008.

 

Mr. Lechleiter is the President of the Catholic Education Foundation of Louisville. From February 2002 until his retirement in January 2014, he served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kindred Healthcare, Inc., a Fortune 500 healthcare services company based in Louisville. Mr. Lechleiter also served in senior financial positions at other large publicly held healthcare services companies such as Humana Inc. and HCA, Inc. during his professional financial career spanning nearly 35 years. His extensive experience in business leadership, financial reporting, corporate finance, investor relations, mergers and acquisitions and corporate governance is valuable to the Board. Mr. Lechleiter serves on the Audit Committee of Bancorp and has been designated by the Board of Directors as an audit committee financial expert. He also chairs the Compensation Committee of Bancorp. 

Mr. Northern is a partner in the Louisville office of Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs LLP where he has practiced law since 1980. Earlier in his career Mr. Northern was a White House Fellow, served as Special Assistant to the United States Secretary of the Interior Cecil Andrus and was the Legislative Director for U.S. Representative Romano Mazzoli. Mr. Northern’s legal experience is valuable to the Board including corporate governance, compliance, strategy and acquisition and development activities. He serves on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp and chairs the Bank’s Risk Committee.

 

Mr. Priebe is President of Hall Contracting of Kentucky, which provides construction services in the areas of heavy construction, asphalt, civil, pipeline, and highway and bridge construction. A registered professional civil engineer, he began his career at Hall in 1986. Mr. Priebe has had extensive involvement with many civic organizations throughout his career. He has worked with the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Training Program and is actively mentoring a local electric contractor. Mr. Priebe’s business acumen and familiarity with the local and regional economic climate bring valuable perspective to the Board. Mr. Priebe serves onas our Lead Independent Director, chairs the AuditNominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp and serves as a member of the Bank’s Trust Committee.Compensation Committee of Bancorp.

 

Mr. TasmanSchutte is PresidentChief Executive Officer of Tasman Industries,GeriMed, Inc., a nationwide group purchasing organization specializing in long-term care pharmacy services for independent pharmacies that serve long-term care providers, such as nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and Tasman Hide Processing headquarteredhospice, as well as prison populations. In February 2017, he founded MainPointe Pharmaceuticals, a national company that markets and distributes pharmaceuticals as well as over-the-counter products and supplements. He also previously served as Chairman of the Board of VistaPharm, for which he was the largest shareholder, until it was sold in Louisville. This family-ownedDecember 2015. Mr. Schutte is also involved in numerous commercial real estate development projects in the Louisville area and elsewhere. His entrepreneurial skills and insights and strong reputation in the Louisville business was founded in 1947 and operates 14 locations in North America with offices in Europe and Asia. The company produces leather and finished products used by the military and general population. Mr. Tasman’s extensive knowledge of consumer demands and global business trends brings a unique perspectivecommunity are beneficial to the Board. He serves on the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee of Bancorp and the Bank’s Risk Committee.Bancorp.

14

 

Ms. Thompson joined the Bank in 1992 as Manager of the Wealth Management and Trust Department, at which time the trustDepartment. The department had $200 million in assets under management. Under her leadership, the department has grown to $2.8currently manages approximately $3.9 billion in assets under management and is one of the most profitable bank-owned trust companies in the country. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Thompson practiced estate planning law and worked in a regional bank’s trust department where she specialized in investment management and estate and personal financial planning.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THESE NOMINEES

 


 

ITEM 2.APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS2. RATIFICATION OF THE 2015 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANSELECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

On February 20, 2018,The Audit Committee has selected BKD, LLP as the Board of Directors adopted, subject to shareholder approval, Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) toCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the Stock Yards Bancorp 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan” or the “2015 Plan”). The Board of Directorsfiscal year ending December 31, 2021 and has directed that management submit the Amendment be submittedselection of the independent registered public accounting firm to shareholders for approvalratification at the Annual Meeting. The Amendment will:

Increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan by 500,000 shares;

Prohibit the payment or vesting of dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested awards; and

Adjust the various share limits under the Plan solely to reflect how those limits apply following our 2016 stock split.

A copyfirm of BKD, LLP has served as the full textCompany’s auditors since June 7, 2018. Representatives of BKD, LLP are expected to be present at the Amendment is attachedmeeting, will have an opportunity to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit A.make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

Shareholders approved the 2015 Plan on April 22, 2015. The 2015 Plan carries forward, but does not increase, the number of shares that were remaining and available to grant under the predecessor equity plan, the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, which expired in 2015. As originally approved by shareholders, the 2015 Plan had 526,278 shares (as adjusted for our 2016 stock split) available for future grants.

If approved, the total number of sharesShareholder ratification of the selection of BKD, LLP as the Company’s common stock thatindependent registered public accounting firm is not required by the Company’s Bylaws or otherwise. However, we are availablesubmitting the selection of BKD, LLP to the shareholders for grants under the Plan will increase from 145,827 shares to 645,827 shares.ratification as a matter of sound corporate practice. If the proposed amendments areshareholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not so approved,to retain BKD, LLP. Even if the increaseselection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent audit firm at any time during the year if it is determined that such a change would be in the number of shares reserved under the Plan pursuant to the amendment and the dividend restriction will not take effect.

The Board of Directors believes that having the additional 500,000 shares of Common Stock available for issuance will ensure that we continue to have a sufficient number of shares available to achieve our current compensation strategy for several years. The Board of Directors believes thebest interests of shareholders will be advanced if we can continue to offer employees, particularly those at the senior management level, the opportunity to acquire or increase their ownership interests in the Company.

Our Board believes our equity award granting practices and the provisions of the 2015 Plan are consistent with the interests of shareholders and sound corporate governance practices. We refer you to the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 23 for additional information concerning our equity award practices. Since 2015, our practice has been to not pay dividends on Plan awards until the awards vest. The Amendment will serve to formalize our current grant practice in this regard.

      The following table sets forth information regarding all grants that have been made under the 2015 Plan to Bancorp’s directors, officers and employees, including the named individuals in the Summary Compensation Table. Information presented in this table does not give effect to awards that were subsequently cancelled, forfeited, surrendered or otherwise not paid in full upon exercise or vesting. Shares subject to these grants become available again for future grants under the plan.

  

Total Awards Under 2015 Equity Compensation Plan

 
  

Stock

Appreciation

Rights

  

Restricted

Stock

  

Performance

Stock Units

  

Total

 

David P. Heintzman, Chairman and CEO

  50,955   -   57,732   108,687 

James A. Hillebrand, President

  29,422   -   33,273   62,695 

Kathy C. Thompson, Senior Executive Vice President and Manager of Investment Management and Trust Department

  23,063   -   26,032   49,095 

Phillip S. Poindexter, Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer

  19,309   -   21,836   41,145 

Nancy B. Davis, Chief Financial Officer

  15,361   -   17,546   32,907 

All executive officers as a group

  179,210   -   202,983   382,193 

All directors as a group excluding employee directors

  3,500   18,331   -   21,831 

All employees as a group excluding named executives

  -   118,514   -   118,514 


Material Features of the Plan

General. The Plan provides that grants may be made in any of the following forms:

Incentive stock options;

Nonqualified stock options;

Stock units;

Stock awards;

Stock appreciation rights;

Dividend equivalents;

Other stock-based awards.

The Plan authorizes a number of shares of Common Stock for issuance equal to the sum of the following: the number of shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding grants under our predecessor equity plan, the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (some of which may expire, be cancelled or forfeited in the future and again be available for grant, as discussed below), plus the number of shares of Common Stock remaining available for issuance under the 2005 Plan but not subject to an outstanding award, in each case as of the date of shareholder approval of the Plan in 2015. As amended, the 2015 Plan will provide that the total number of shares authorized for issuance will be equal to the sum of these two amounts plus 500,000 shares. No more than 450,000 of these reserved shares (as adjusted for our 2016 stock split) may be used for incentive stock options under the 2015 Plan.

The Plan provides limits on the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which grants may be made during any calendar year is as follows (each of the share limits is adjusted for our 2016 stock split):

For non-employee directors, 4,500 shares via options and SARs and 3,750 via stock awards or stock units; and

For any other participant, 112,500 total shares with no more than 60,000 shares via options and SARs and 52,500 via stock awards or stock units. 

The number of shares available under the 2015 Plan and the individual limits on annual awards are both subject to adjustment for stock splits, etc. as described below.

If and to the extent options and SARs granted under the 2005 or 2015 Plan terminate, expire or are cancelled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without being exercised or if any stock awards, stock units, or other stock-based awards under those plans are forfeited, terminated, or otherwise not paid in full, the shares subject to such grants will become available again for purposes of the Plan. Shares otherwise issuable under the Plan that are withheld or surrendered in payment of the exercise price of an option, and shares withheld or surrendered for payment of taxes will not be available again for issuance or transfer under the Plan. If any grants are paid in cash, and not in shares of Common Stock, any shares of Common Stock related to such grants will also be available for future grants. Upon the exercise of a SAR, then both for purposes of calculating the number of shares of Common Stock remaining available for issuance under the Plan and the number of shares of Common Stock remaining available for exercise under the SAR, the number of such shares will be reduced by the net number of shares for which the SAR is exercised, and without regard to any cash settlement of a SAR.

Administration. The Plan is administered and interpreted by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”). Ministerial functions may be performed by an administrative committee of the employees appointed by the Committee. The Committee has the authority to (i) determine individuals to whom grants will be made under the Plan, (ii) determine the type, size, terms and conditions of grants, (iii) determine when grants will be made and the duration of any applicable exercise or restriction period, including criteria for exercisability and acceleration of exercisability, (iv) amend terms and conditions of any previously issued grant, subject to limitations described below and (v) deal with any other matters arising under the Plan. The Committee presently consists of Charles R. Edinger, III, Richard A. Lechleiter, and Norman Tasman, each of whom is a non-employee member of the Board of Directors.

Eligibility for Participation. Designated employees and non-employee directors of the Company and its subsidiaries are eligible to receive grants under the Plan. The Committee is authorized to select persons to receive grants from among those eligible and will determine the number of shares of Common Stock that are subject to each grant.


Vesting. The Committee determines the vesting of awards granted under the Plan provided that all awards will have a minimum of one year (cliff or incremental) vesting, which may be accelerated only in the events of death, disability, retirement or change in control.shareholders.

 

Types of Awards.

Stock Options

The Committee may grant options intended to qualify as incentive stock options (“ISOs”) within the meaning of section 422 of the Code or nonqualified stock options (“NQSOs”) that are not intended to so qualify or any combination of ISOs and NQSOs. Anyone eligible to participate in the Plan may receive a grant of NQSOs. Only employees may receive a grant of ISOs.

The Committee will fix the exercise price per share of options on the date of grant. The exercise price of options granted under the Plan will not be less than the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of grant. However, if the grantee of an ISO is a person who holds more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of the outstanding stock, the exercise price per share of an ISO granted to such person must be at least 110% of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of grant.

The Committee will determine the term of each option which will not exceed 10 years from date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the grantee of an ISO is a person who holds more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of the outstanding stock, the term of the ISO may not exceed five years from the date of grant. To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of shares of Common Stock, determined on the date of grant, with respect to which ISOs become exercisable for the first time by a grantee during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, such ISOs will be treated as NQSOs. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which ISOs may be granted under the Plan is 300,000, subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Plan.

The Committee will determine terms and conditions of options, including when they become exercisable. The Committee may accelerate exercisability of any options, subject to the Plan’s one-year vesting minimum. Except as provided in the grant instrument or as otherwise determined by the Committee, an option may only be exercised while a grantee is employed by or providing service as a non-employee director.

A grantee may exercise an option by delivering notice of exercise to the Company. The grantee will pay the exercise price and any withholding taxes for the option in cash, if permitted by the Committee, by the surrender of already-owned shares of Common Stock with an aggregate fair market value on the date the option is exercised equal to the exercise price, by payment through a broker in accordance with the procedures permitted by Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board, or, if permitted by the Committee, by surrender or withholding of shares that would otherwise have been issuable upon exercise with a fair market value at the time of exercise equal to the exercise price, or by another method approved by the Committee. Tax withholding arrangements acceptable to the Committee must also be made upon exercise of a NQSO.

If allowed by the Committee, a participant may elect to exercise an option before it is vested, but if this is permitted, the shares issued on exercise will be subject to a repurchase right in favor of the Company at their exercise value (or then fair market value, if less) until the option would have been vested.

Stock Units

The Committee may grant stock units to anyone eligible to participate in the Plan. Each stock unit provides the grantee with the right to receive a share of Common Stock or an amount based on the value of a share of Common Stock at a future date. The Committee will determine the number of stock units that will be granted, whether stock units will become payable based on achievement of performance goals or other conditions, and the other terms and conditions applicable to stock units.


Stock units may be paid at the end of a specified period or deferred to a date authorized by the Committee. If a stock unit becomes payable, it will be paid to the grantee in cash, in shares of Common Stock, or in a combination of cash and shares of Common Stock, as determined by the Committee. All unvested stock units are forfeited if the grantee’s employment or service is terminated for any reason, unless the Committee determines otherwise.

The Committee may grant dividend equivalents in connection with grants of stock units made under the Plan. Dividend equivalents entitle the grantee to receive amounts equal to ordinary dividends that are paid on the shares underlying a grant while the grant is outstanding. The Committee will determine whether dividend equivalents will be paid currently or credited to a bookkeeping account as a dollar amount or in the form of stock units and then only paid at vesting of the underlying stock unit. The terms and conditions of dividend equivalents will be determined by the Committee.

Stock Awards

The Committee may grant stock awards to anyone eligible to participate in the Plan. The Committee may require that grantees pay consideration for stock awards and may impose restrictions on stock awards. If restrictions are imposed on stock awards, the Committee will determine whether they will lapse over a period of time or according to such other criteria, including achievement of specific performance goals, as the Committee determines.

The Committee will determine the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the grant of stock awards and the other terms and conditions of the grant including whether the grantee will have the right to vote shares of Common Stock and to receive dividends paid on such shares during the restriction period. Unless the Committee determines otherwise, all unvested stock awards are forfeited if the grantee’s employment or service is terminated for any reason.

Stock Appreciation Rights

The Committee may grant SARs to anyone eligible to participate in the Plan. SARs may be granted in connection with, or independently of, any option granted under the Plan. Upon exercise of an SAR, the grantee will be paid an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the base amount of the SAR which base amount will be no less than the fair market value per share of Common Stock on the date the SAR is granted. Such payment to the grantee will be in cash, in shares of Common Stock, or in a combination of cash and shares of Common Stock, as determined by the Committee. The Committee will determine the term of each SAR, which will not exceed 10 years from the date of grant.

The base amount of each SAR will be determined by the Committee and will be equal to the per-share exercise price of the related option or, if there is no related option, an amount that is equal to or greater than the fair market value of Common Stock on the date the SAR is granted. The Committee will determine the terms and conditions of SARs, including when they become exercisable. The Committee may accelerate the exercisability of any SARs.

Other Stock-Based Awards

The Committee may grant other stock-based awards, which are grants other than options, SARs, stock units, and stock awards. The Committee may grant other stock-based awards to anyone eligible to participate in the Plan. These grants will be based on or measured by shares of Common Stock, and will be payable in cash, in shares of Common Stock, or in a combination of cash and shares of Common Stock. The terms and conditions for other stock-based awards will be determined by the Committee.

Deferrals. The Committee may permit or require grantees to defer receipt of payment of cash or delivery of shares of Common Stock that would otherwise be due to the grantee in connection with any stock units or other stock-based awards under the Plan. The Committee will establish rules and procedures applicable to any such deferrals and may provide for interest or other earnings to be paid on such deferrals.

Adjustment Provisions. In connection with stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and certain other events affecting Common Stock, the Committee will make adjustments as it deems appropriate in the maximum number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance as grants, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that any individual participating in the Plan may be granted in any year, the number and kind of shares covered by outstanding grants, the kind of shares that may be issued or transferred under the Plan, and the price per share or market value of any outstanding grants. Any fractional shares resulting from such adjustment will be eliminated. In addition, in the event of a change of control, the provisions applicable to a change in control will apply. Any adjustments to outstanding grants will be consistent with section 409A or 422 of the Code, to the extent applicable.


Change of Control. Upon a change of control, and unless otherwise provided in a grant agreement, all outstanding options and SARs held by persons whose employment ends within 24 months thereafter (with exception for cause, as defined by the Committee in a grant agreement) will accelerate and become fully exercisable and any restrictions of conditions on outstanding stock awards, stock units or dividend equivalents will lapse (so-called “double-trigger” vesting).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a change of control, the Committee may also take any of the following actions with respect to any or all outstanding grants under the Plan.

Require that grantees surrender their options and SARs in exchange for payment by us, in cash or shares of Common Stock as determined by the Committee, in an amount equal to the amount by which the then fair market value of the shares subject to the grantees’ unexercised options and SARs exceeds the exercise price of the options or the base amount of the SARs, as applicable;

After giving grantees the opportunity to exercise their options and SARs, terminate any or all unexercised options and SARs at such time as the Committee deems appropriate; or

Determine that outstanding options and SARs that are not exercised will be assumed by, or replaced with comparable options or rights by, the surviving corporation (or a parent or subsidiary of the surviving corporation), and other outstanding grants that remain in effect after the change of control will be converted to similar grants of the surviving corporation (or a parent or subsidiary of the surviving corporation).

In general terms, a change of control under the Plan occurs:

If a person, entity or affiliated group (with certain exceptions) acquires more than 20% of the then outstanding voting securities;

If the Company consummates a merger into another entity, unless the holders of the voting shares immediately prior to the merger have at least 80% of the combined voting power of the securities in the merged entity or its parent;

If shareholders approve a plan to liquidate or dissolve the Company;

If the Company consummates an agreement to sell or dispose of the Company or substantially all of the Company’s assets; or

If there is turnover in majority of Board seats over a two year period, other than with replacements that were approved by 2/3rd of the Board members in office before their election.

For any grants of awards subject to 409A (discussed below), the payment timing of which is triggered upon a change in control, the transaction constituting a change of control must also constitute a change of control for purposes of Section 409A.

Transferability of Grants. Only the grantee may exercise rights under a grant during the grantee’s lifetime. A grantee may not transfer those rights except by will or the laws of descent and distribution; provided, however, that a grantee may transfer a grant other than an ISO pursuant to a domestic relations order. The Committee may also provide in a grant agreement, that a grantee may transfer NQSOs to his or her family members, or one or more trusts or other entities for benefit of or owned by such family members, consistent with applicable securities laws, according to such terms as the Committee may determine.

Repricing of Options. Except in relation to transactions that trigger appropriate adjustments in awards (see below), neither the Board nor the Committee can amend the price of outstanding options or SARs under the Plan to reduce the exercise price or cancel such options or SARs in exchange for cash or other awards of options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original options or SARs, without prior shareholder approval.


Clawback Policy. All grants made under the Plan are subject to any compensation, clawback or recoupment policy that may be applicable to employees of the Company; as such policy may be in effect from time to time, whether or not approved before or after the effective date of the Plan.

Amendment and Termination of the Plan. The Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time, subject to shareholder approval if such approval is required under any applicable laws or stock exchange requirements.

New Plan Benefits. Grants under the 2015 Plan are discretionary, so it is currently not possible to predict the number of shares of Common Stock that will be granted or who will receive grants under the 2015 Plan after the Annual Meeting.

Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Plan

The federal income tax consequences of grants under the Plan will depend on the type of grant. The following description provides only a general description of the application of federal income tax laws to grants under the Plan. This discussion is intended for the information of shareholders considering how to vote at the Annual Meeting and not as tax guidance to grantees, as consequences may vary with the types of grants made, identity of grantees, and method of payment or settlement. The summary does not address effects of other federal taxes (including possible “golden parachute” excise taxes) or taxes imposed under state, local, or foreign tax laws.

From the grantees’ standpoint, as a general rule, ordinary income will be recognized at the time of delivery of shares of Common Stock or payment of cash under the Plan. Future appreciation on shares of Common Stock held beyond the ordinary income recognition event will be taxable as capital gain when shares of Common Stock are sold. The tax rate applicable to capital gain will depend upon how long the grantee holds the shares. The Company, as a general rule, for all awards other than ISOs, will be entitled to a tax deduction that corresponds in time and amount to the ordinary income recognized by the grantee, and the Company will not be entitled to any tax deduction with respect to capital gain income recognized by the grantee.

Exceptions to these general rules arise under the following circumstances:

(i) If shares of Common Stock, when delivered, are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture by reason of any employment or performance-related condition, ordinary income taxation and the tax deduction will be delayed until the risk of forfeiture lapses, unless the grantee makes a special election to accelerate taxation under section 83(b) of the Code.

(ii) If an employee exercises a stock option that qualifies as an ISO, no ordinary income will be recognized, and the Company will not be entitled to any tax deduction, if shares of Common Stock acquired upon exercise of the stock option are held until the later of one year from the date of exercise and two years from the date of grant. However, if the employee disposes of the shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO before satisfying both holding period requirements, the employee will recognize ordinary income at the time of the disposition equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise (or the amount realized on the disposition, if less) and the exercise price, and the Company will be entitled to a tax deduction in that amount. The gain, if any, in excess of the amount recognized as ordinary income will be long-term or short-term capital gain, depending upon the length of time the employee held the shares before the disposition.

(iii) A grant may be subject to a 20% tax, in addition to ordinary income tax, at the time the grant becomes vested, plus interest, if the grant constitutes deferred compensation under section 409A of the Code and the requirements of section 409A of the Code are not satisfied.

The Company has the right to require that grantees pay an amount necessary to satisfy the federal, state or local tax withholding obligations with respect to grants or exercises of awards. The Company may withhold from other amounts payable to a grantee an amount necessary to satisfy these obligations. The Committee may permit a grantee to satisfy the withholding obligation with respect to grants paid in shares of Common Stock by having shares withheld, at the time grants become taxable, provided that the number of shares withheld does not exceed the individual’s minimum applicable withholding tax rate for federal, state and local tax liabilities.


Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information regarding Bancorp’s equity compensation plans under which Common Stock may be issued to directors, officers and employees of Bancorp or the Bank as of December 31, 2017.  These plans include the 2015 Plan and a prior plan, the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.  The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan expired in 2015.  For further information on stock-based awards under Bancorp’s equity compensation plans, see note 17 to the consolidated financial statements in Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Plan Category

 

Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options and SARs

  

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
and SARs

  

Number of
securities to be
issued upon vesting
of restricted shares
(1)

  

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

  704,363  $19.51   124,052   302,727 
                 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

            

(1)  In addition to awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units, Bancorp has made grants of performance stock units (“PSUs”) to its executive officers under the 2015 Plan. The number of shares to be issued upon vesting of the PSUs is dependent upon Bancorp achieving certain predefined performance targets and ranges from zero shares to approximately 205,000 shares. As of December 31, 2017, the expected shares to be awarded are 155,497.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO AMENDRATIFICATION OF THE 2015 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANSELECTION OF BKD, LLP

 

 

 

ITEM 3.3. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

We are asking our shareholders to provide an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers disclosed in the REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION section of this Proxy Statement. We have included this proposal among the items to be considered at the Annual Meeting pursuant to the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. While this vote is non-binding on our Company and the Board of Directors, it will provide the Compensation Committee with information regarding investor sentiment aboutregarding our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices which the Committee will be able to consider when determining future executive compensation arrangements. Our current policy is to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation each year. We expect to hold the next advisory vote at our 2019 annual meeting2022 Annual Meeting of shareholders.Shareholders. Following is a summary of some of the key points of our 20172020 executive compensation program. See the REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION section of this Proxy Statement for more information.

 

The pay-for-performance compensation philosophy of the Compensation Committee supports Stock Yards Bancorp’s primary objective of creating value for its shareholders.  The Committee strives to ensure that compensation of Stock Yards Bancorp’s executive officers is market-competitive to attract and retain talented individuals to lead Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank to growth and higher profitability while maintaining stability and capital strength.  Our executive compensation program has been designed to align managements’ interests with those of our shareholders. In addition, the program seeks to mitigate risks related to compensation. In designing the 20172020 compensation program, the Compensation Committee used key performance measurements to motivate our executive officers to achieve short-term and long-term business goals after reviewing peer and market data and the Company’s business expectations for 2017.2020.

15

 

We believe that the information provided regarding executive compensation in this Proxy Statement demonstrates that our executive compensation program was designed appropriately and is working to maximize shareholder return while mitigating risk and aligning managements’ interests with our shareholders. Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that shareholders approve the following advisory resolution:

 


RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’sCompany’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement pursuant to the executive compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other executive compensation tables and related narratives.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

Set forth in the following table is the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of December 31, 20172020 for each person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock; all our directors and executive officers as a group; and directors, executive officers and employees as a group. “Executive officer” means the chairman, president, any vice president in charge of a principal business unit, division or function, or other officer who performs a policy making function or any other person who performs similar policy making functions and is so designated by the Board of Directors. For a description of the voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by the current directors, nominees for election as directors and named executive officers of Stock Yards Bancorp, see the tables below.following tables.

 

  

Amount and Nature

  

Percent of

 
  

of Beneficial

  

Stock Yards Bancorp

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Ownership

  

Common Stock (1)

 
         

BlackRock, Inc.

  1,545,281 (2)  6.8% 

55 East 52nd Street

        

New York, NY 10055

        
         

Fidelity Management & Research Company

  1,366,357 (2)  6.0% 

245 Summer Street

        

Boston, MA 02210

        
         

Directors and executive officers of Bancorp and

  1,746,921 (3)  7.6% 

the Bank as a group (17 persons)

        
         

Directors, executive officers, and employees of

  2,551,471 (3) (4)  11.0% 

Bancorp and the Bank as a group (526 persons)

        

Amount and Nature

Percent of

of Beneficial

Stock Yards Bancorp

Name of Beneficial Owner

Ownership

Common Stock (1)

BlackRock, Inc.

1,579,108(2)

7.0%

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

1,316,506(3)

5.8%

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company

1,264,444(4)

5.6%

1040 East Main Street

Louisville, KY 40206

Directors and executive officers of Bancorp and

1,449,633(5)

6.3%

the Bank as a group (16 persons)

Directors, executive officers, and employees of

2,033,492(5) (6)

8.8%

Bancorp and the Bank as a group (573 persons)

 


16

 

(1)

Shares of Stock Yards Bancorp Common Stock subject to stock options andoutstanding stock appreciation rights (SARs) that are currently exercisable or may become exercisable within the following 60 days under Stock Yards Bancorp’ss Stock Incentive Plans are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of Stock Yards Bancorp Common Stock beneficially owned by the person and group holding such options and stock appreciation rightsSARs but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of Stock Yards Bancorp Common Stock beneficially owned by any other person or group.

(2)

Based upon Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC as of December 31, 2020.

(3)

Based upon Schedule 13G filed with the SEC as of December 31, 2017.2020.


(3)(4)

The Bank holds these shares in its various fiduciary capacities as agent, personal representative, custodian and trustee. Of these shares, (a) all are held with sole voting power, (b) 869,148 shares are held with sole investment power, and (c) 183,955 shares are held with shared investment power.

(5)

Includes 362,563391,909 shares held by directors and executive officers subject to outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rightsSARs that are currently exercisable or may become exercisable within the following 60 days and 103,796101,107 shares held in KSOP accounts.

(4)(6)

The shares held by the group include those described in note (3)(5) above and 280,734219,219 shares held by non-executive officers and employees of the Bank. In addition, includes 110,24345,591 shares subject to stock options and stock appreciation rightsoutstanding SARs that are currently exercisable or may become exercisable within the following 60 days held by non-executive officers of the Bank and 413,573319,049 shares held by non-executive officers and employees of the Bank in their KSOP accounts, with sole voting power and investment power. Stock Yards Bancorp has not undertaken the expense and effort of compiling the number of shares other officers and employees of the Bank may hold other than directly in their own name.

 

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.’s Common Stock as of December 31, 20172020 by each current director, each nominee for election as directorsdirector and each named executive officer.

 

Name

 

Number of Shares Beneficially

Owned
(1) (2) (3) (4)

  

Percent of Stock Yards

Bancorp Common Stock

 
             

Paul J. Bickel III

  4,250   (6)  (5)

J. McCauley Brown

  9,101   (7)  (5)

Nancy B. Davis

  127,991       (5)

Charles R. Edinger III

  341,520   (8)  1.48%

David P. Heintzman

  332,887   (9)  1.45%

Donna L. Heitzman

  3,493       (5)

Carl G. Herde

  41,948       (5)

James A. Hillebrand

  181,151   (10)  (5)

Richard A. Lechleiter

  22,073   (11)  (5)

Richard Northern

  43,075       (5)

Phillip S. Poindexter

  71,867       (5)

Stephen M. Priebe

  16,736       (5)

Norman Tasman

  302,146   (12)  1.31%

Kathy C. Thompson

  85,978       (5)

Name

 

Number of Shares

Beneficially Owned(1) (2) (3) (4)

 

Percent of Stock Yards

Bancorp Common Stock

Paul J. Bickel III

 

26,828

(6)

 

      (5)

J. McCauley Brown

 

14,173

(7)

 

      (5)

William M. Dishman III

 

64,517

(8)

 

      (5)

David P. Heintzman

 

286,107

(9)

 

1.25%

Donna L. Heitzman

 

10,726

(10)

 

      (5)

Carl G. Herde

 

51,452

  

      (5)

James A. Hillebrand

 

222,165

(11)

 

      (5)

Richard A. Lechleiter

 

27,966

(12)

 

      (5)

Philip S. Poindexter

 

95,373

(13)

 

      (5)

Stephen M. Priebe

 

24,704

  

      (5)

John L. Schutte

 

83,681

(14)

 

      (5)

T. Clay Stinnett

 

89,635

(15)

 

      (5)

Norman Tasman

 

314,907

(16)

 

1.37%

Kathy C. Thompson

 

76,887

  

      (5)

 

(1)

Includes,Includes, where noted, shares in which members of the nominee’sdirectors, nominees or executive officer’sofficers immediate family have a beneficial interest. The column does not, however, include the interest of certain of the listed directors, nominees or executive officerofficers in shares held by other non-dependent family members in their own right. In each case, the principal disclaims beneficial ownership of any such shares, and declares that the listing in this Proxy Statement should not be construed as an admission that the principal is the beneficial owner of any such securities.


(2)

Includes shares subject to outstanding stock options and SARs that are currently exercisable or may become exercisable within the following 60 days and unvested restricted shares issued under Stock Yards Bancorp’sBancorps Stock Incentive Plan(s) as follows:

 

Name

 

Number of
Stock Options
and SARs

  

Number of
Unvested Restricted
Stock Grants

 

Bickel

  -   - 

Brown

  600   585 

Davis

  24,435   449 

Edinger

  -   585 

Heintzman

  146,170   862 

Heitzman

  200   585 

Herde

  -   585 

Hillebrand

  93,074   - 

Lechleiter

  -   585 

Northern

  1,500   585 

Poindexter

  36,647   261 

Priebe

  1,500   585 

Tasman

  -   585 

Thompson

  16,770   778 
17

 

Name

 

Number of
SARs

  

Number of
Unvested Restricted
Stock Grants

 

Bickel

  600   730 

Brown

  1,500   730 

Dishman

  32,363   - 

Heintzman

  111,277   730 

Heitzman

  800   730 

Herde

  -   730 

Hillebrand

  114,732   - 

Lechleiter

  -   730 

Poindexter

  49,456   - 

Priebe

  1,500   730 

Schutte

  400   730 

Stinnett

  38,913   - 

Tasman

  -   730 

Thompson

  12,626   - 

 

(3)

Includes shares held in Directors’Directors Deferred Compensation Plan as follows:

 

  

Number

 

Name

 

of Shares

 

Bickel

  -5,243 

Brown

  1,387

Edinger

36,7253,210 

Heitzman

  1,2086,178 

Herde

  20,02421,719 

Hillebrand

  427466 

Lechleiter

  17,847

Northern

17,76021,846 

Priebe

  11,98519,713

Schutte

2,997 

Tasman

  61,15873,360 

 

(4)

Includes shares held in the Company’ss KSOP as follows:

 

  

Number

 

Name

 

of Shares

 

DavisDishman

  265

Heintzman

14,8466,987 

Hillebrand

  21,29723,542 

Poindexter

  12,08713,559

Stinnett

12,342 

Thompson

  31,76834,893 

 

(5)

Less than one percent of outstanding Stock Yards Bancorp Common Stock.

(6)

HeldIncludes 10,500 shares held jointly by Mr. Bickel and his wife.

(7)

Includes 3,987 shares owned by Mr. Brown’ss wife.

(8)

Includes 102,3225,055 shares owned by Mr. Edinger’sDishmans wife.

(9)

Includes 6,06124,070 shares owned by Mr. Heintzman’sHeintzmans wife.

(10)

Includes 22,5001,818 shares held jointly by Ms. Heitzman and her husband; and 200 shares owned by Ms. Heitzmans husband.

(11)

Includes 14,653 shares held jointly by Mr. Hillebrand and his wife; 11,634 shares owned by Mr. Hillebrand’sHillebrands wife; and 586 shares held as custodian for children.

18

(11)(12)

Includes 9001,400 shares held as custodian for children and 1,0501,300 shares held in the name of Mr. Lechleiters mother.

(13)

Includes 291 shares held as custodian for Mr. Poindexters children.

(14)

Includes 2,250 shares owned by Mr. Lechleiter’s mother.Schuttes wife.

(12)(15)

Includes 445 shares owned by Mr. Stinnetts wife and 176 shares held as custodian for their children.

(16)

Includes 89,038 shares held jointly by Mr.Tasman and his wife; and 7,027 shares held as custodian for their son.

 


DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEREPORTS

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers, our directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of Stock Yards Bancorp’sBancorp’s Common Stock to file initial reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NASDAQ. Such executive officers, directors and shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations from the applicable executive officers and our directors, all persons subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) filed the required reports on a timely basis for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, with the exception of Ms. Heitzman,Michael Rehm, Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of the Bank, who purchased 500completed two open market sales transactions on July 24, 2020 and August 19, 2020, for a total of 1,755 shares on October 30, 2017 and reported the transactionboth transactions on December 21, 2017.November 3, 2020.

 


 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

 

REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This compensation discussion and analysis (“CD&A”) reflectsdescribes the philosophy, objectives, process, components and additional aspects of our 20172020 executive compensation programprogram. This CD&A is intended to be read in conjunction with respect to the tables and related narrative disclosure that immediately follow this section, which provide further historical compensation information for the following named executive officers (“NEOs”) whose compensation is detailed in:

Name

Position

James A. Hillebrand

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“Chairman/CEO”)

Philip S. Poindexter

President

T. Clay Stinnett

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)

Kathy C. Thompson

Senior Executive Vice President and Manager of Wealth Management & Trust

William M. Dishman III

Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer

CD&A Reference Guide

Executive Summary

Section I

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

SectionII

Compensation Determination Process

SectionIII

Components of Our Compensation Program

SectionIV

Additional Compensation Policies and Practices

SectionV

I.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2020 Select Business Results

In 2020 we continued our track record of performing at the top of our peer group on key profitability measures such as return on average assets (“ROAA”) and return on average equity (“ROAE”). As shown below for 2020, our ROAE ranked well above the 90th percentile of the compensation tables that followpeer group, as it has for many years. Our ROAA for 2020 was slightly below the CD&A. In this discussion, we explain our75th percentile of the compensation philosophypeer group.

 

 

ROAA 

 

ROAE 

25th percentile

 

0.75

%

 

6.65

%

50th percentile

 

1.15

%

 

10.97

%

75th percentile

 

1.42

%

 

12.82

%

90th percentile

 

1.46

%

 

13.47

%

Stock Yards Bancorp 

 

1.40 

% 

 

14.01

% 

Financial Results

● 

Net income decreased 11% to $58.9 million

● 

Earnings per share (“EPS”) decreased 10% to $2.59 per diluted share

● 

ROAE was 14.01%, a decrease from 17.09% the prior year

● 

ROAA was 1.40%, a decrease from 1.90% the prior year

20

graph01.jpg

Operating Results

● 

Loans increased $687 million, or 24%, driven by record loan production and strong net loan growth

● 

Asset and credit quality remained strong, among the highest relative to our peers

● 

Total revenue, comprising fully tax equivalent net interest income and non-interest income, of $188.0 million, surpassed the previous record of $175.0 million in 2019

graph02.jpg

2020 Shareholder Return

● 

1-year total shareholder return (“TSR”): 2%; 3-year TSR: 17%; and 5-year TSR: 82%

● 

Substantial and sustained dividend payout ratio; rate raised 13 times since 2013

● 

In early 2021, announced the pending acquisition of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc., which is expected to close in the second quarter of 2021.

21

graph03.jpg

Performance Orientation of 2020 Compensation

Chairman/CEO Compensation Majority Performance-Based (Equity and program, factors considered by theTotal). The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) in making compensation decisions and additional details of our practices.Board of Directors is responsible for the design and administration of our executive compensation program. The Committee’s philosophy is to place at risk a significant portion of executive officers’ total compensation, making it contingent on Company performance while remaining consistent with our risk management policies. As such, the Committee has structured the majority of the compensation of the Chairman/CEO as variable, at-risk and subject to the achievement of performance goals in order to be earned. Approximately 52% of the Chairman/CEO’s grant date target total direct compensation, consisting of base salary, short-term incentive opportunity and long-term incentive opportunity, was variable, at-risk and performance-based. Seventy-five percent of the long-term incentive equity grants were performance-based and were in the form of performance share units (“PSUs”). These PSUs are subject to three-year performance metrics tied to our key operating goals and will vest at the end of a three-year performance period, subject to a mandatory one-year post-vesting holding period. The other 25% were in the form of time-based stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) that vest over five years.

 

Our 2017 NEOs are:Long-Term Incentives: 75% PSUs, 25% SARs; Three-Year Performance Period; High Threshold Performance Level. For the long-term incentive equity grants to executive officers, the Committee utilized PSUs to motivate operational achievement and link pay to performance, and SARs to motivate stock price appreciation over the long term, because they deliver value only if the stock price increases. For the grants in the form of PSUs, the Committee established three-year goals at the outset of the performance period for relative ROAA (85th percentile is target performance, a rigorous and challenging level of achievement that was increased from the 80th percentile in 2019) and cumulative EPS, the target for which reflects a solid growth rate.

Assessed Criteria and Updated Peer Group. The Committee evaluates annually the group of peer companies used as a reference point for evaluating executive compensation. In connection with determining 2020 executive compensation, the Committee reviewed its criteria, in part because of the Company’s having fallen to the 38th percentile by revenue of the existing peer group. As part of this review, the Committee determined to maintain its key criteria, which led to the removal of four companies and the addition of two companies. As a result, the Company moved closer to the median for annual revenue and assets.

22

COVID-19-Related Actions

Operating results for the year were lower compared to the record results posted in 2019, primarily due to pandemic-related increases in loan loss provisioning. Despite solid traditional credit metrics, we recorded a significant provision for credit losses (“provision”) during the past year. The 2020 provision expense was $16.9 million, compared to $1.0 million in 2019, based on our adoption of the new CECL provisioning methodology as required under the relevant accounting standards, the expected impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on forecasted unemployment and changing macro-economic conditions, and qualitative factor adjustments. In light of the unique circumstances in 2020, the Committee reviewed the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on Company performance and thus on incentive programs, and determined it was in the best interests of shareholders and participants to make responsible, one-time adjustments to both performance goals and to payout opportunities, which were lowered, in recognition of the impact of the pandemic on our business. These one-time adjustments were applied only to the 2020 Short-Term Incentive Plan, and neither the criteria nor the payout opportunities under either the 2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan or any outstanding PSUs were adjusted.

These actions occurred amid broader considerations of the impact of COVID-19 on the Company. Specifically, we took actions to protect our employees and prioritize their well-being, including the following:

 

 

David P. Heintzman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”);No furloughs or layoffs

 

Nancy B. Davis, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”);No reductions in employee pay or benefits

 

James A. Hillebrand, President;Payment of special one-time COVID-related bonuses to frontline employees

 

Kathy C. Thompson, Senior Executive Vice President and Manager of the Wealth Management and Trust (“WM&T”) Department; andPay protection for employees that were directly affected by COVID

 

Phillip S. Poindexter, Executive Vice PresidentEnhancement of workplace safety, including heightened cleaning, distancing and Chief Lending Officer.remote working protocols

Executive Summary

2017Business Highlights

 

Solid loan growth which increased the Company’s loan portfolio almost 5%;Extended flexibility of work hour schedules based on schooling and childcare needs

 

Consistently strong net interest margin;Allowed employees to roll unused vacation days into 2021 and 2022 in recognition of reduced vacation opportunities in 2020

 

Credit quality remained at historically strong levels; andNo executive salary increases for 2021

 

Annual Cash Incentives. In light of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on financial performance, on September 15, 2020, the Committee made the decision to shift the EPS metrics from a GAAP EPS amount to a pre-provision EPS amount for the full year. Provision is the aspect of performance that is most volatile and most materially affected by COVID-19 and related economic impacts in 2020. We believe that pre-provision EPS more accurately reflected our fundamental performance in 2020 and is a better indicator of the long-term impacts of 2020 performance. In light of this change, and in recognition of shareholder expectations and views on mid-cycle changes, the Committee also reduced each payout opportunity level by 50% in recognition of the adjusted metric in an unprecedented year. Line of business goals for line of business executives such as Ms. Thompson were unchanged, but the associated payout component was lowered by 25%.

Continued growth in fee income, led by the Wealth Management and Trust Group.

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2017

  

2016

 

Net income per share, diluted (1)

 $1.66  $1.80 

Return on average equity (“ROAE”) (2)

  11.61%  13.49%

Return on average assets (“ROAA”) (2)

  1.25%  1.42%

Long-Term Incentive Equity. During the discussion of changes to annual cash incentives, the Committee determined to leave the goals and structure of all aspects of PSUs and SARs unchanged given the long-term horizon of such awards.

 

Key 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions and Outcomes

In 2020, we had strong fundamental performance, outperformed our peers and took prudent compensation action to balance shareholder experience, GAAP performance, core performance, future expectations and executive interests.

Base Salaries. Base salary increases ranged from zero to 3.7% depending on changes in market data, the time since the executive received a salary adjustment and other factors.    

Annual Cash Incentives. The Compensation Committee undertook a rigorous process to set the performance targets for 2020. As the effects of the pandemic unfolded, it became clear to the Committee that our Threshold level of corporate EPS under our annual incentive plan would likely not be attained due primarily to increased loan loss provision, and that annual incentive payments for at least four of our executives would be eliminated entirely. The Committee did not believe that our core operating performance warranted elimination of annual incentive payouts and therefore made adjustments as described on page 35.

Annual cash incentive opportunities for four of our NEOs, Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and Dishman, are tied exclusively to corporate profitability, as measured by EPS. Ms. Thompson’s short-term incentive plan incorporates goals related to her line of business responsibilities as well as Company-wide profitability.

23

Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and Dishman

The primary performance metric utilized for Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and Dishman was EPS. The initial target performance goal for 2020 was set below the prior year amount in recognition of unique circumstances associated with changes to accounting rules and the one-time benefit observed in 2019, but the goal nevertheless required strong performance to achieve above-target payouts even after the COVID-related adjustments.

The EPS metric had a performance threshold of 96% of target and a performance maximum of 104% of target. The Committee uses EPS because it believes EPS drives long-term shareholder return, as it represents the culmination of executive officers’ efforts regarding profitability, revenue growth, expense control, risk profile and other elements.

The revised target annual incentive plan opportunities of each of Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and Dishman were denominated as a percentage of base salary based on external and internal factors applicable to the positions held by these individuals, among other things, and ranged from 15% to 25% of base salary. Payouts were capped at 200% of the lowered target payout.

Company-wide performance accounted for 100% of the annual incentive plan opportunity for Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and Dishman; there was no allocation to individual performance goals. All of our eligible executive officers participate in the annual incentive plan on the same terms, other than the target percentage of base salary, and Ms. Thompson has additional components relating to her area of responsibility.

As described above, GAAP EPS decreased 10% to $2.59 per diluted share driven largely by a dramatic increase in provision for potential future loan losses due to the combination of CECL adoption and the pandemic. On a pre-provision basis, our EPS was $3.17 compared to a Target of $2.89, which led to short-term incentive payouts to Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and Dishman at 200% of Target.

Ms. Thompson

Ms. Thompson’s short-term incentive includes three components: income before overhead allocations and taxes, consolidated EPS of the Company, and net new business. Ms. Thompson’s incentive is weighted 75% for her line of business and 25% for overall Company performance, and the Committee considers her line of business goals to be appropriately challenging to attain. Financial results drove the short-term incentive payout to Ms. Thompson at 200% of target.

Long-Term Incentive Equity. The Company’s 2020 long-term incentives consisted of 75% PSUs (by grant date value) that vest based on performance over a three-year measurement period, and 25% SARs that vest over five years.

The performance metrics for the PSUs, which are weighted 50% each, are three-year relative ROAA, with the target set at the 85th percentile and the threshold set at the 80th percentile of the peer group, a very challenging relative level of performance; and three-year cumulative EPS, a true long-term performance period using a metric viewed as central to increasing long-term shareholder value. These objectives were increased from the 2019 plan, which used a target goal of the 80th percentile and a threshold goal of the 75th percentile, as a reflection of our high performance expectations relative to our peers and the broader banking market.

No pandemic-related changes were implemented to our long-term incentive awards granted in 2020 or prior years.

PSUs granted in 2018 vested as of December 31, 2020 and will be certified and distributed by March 31, 2021. Based on our aggregate EPS for the three-year performance period 2018-2020 and preliminary data indicating that our average ROAA for the three-year performance period of 1.68% significantly exceeded the 90th percentile of the comparator group, we expect that recipients will be awarded grants on the EPS portion at target and the ROAA portion at the maximum performance levels.

24

Increased Stock Ownership Guidelines. In November 2020 the Committee’s regular review of our stock ownership guidelines led us to increase the multiple for our Chairman/CEO from 5x to 6x to remain in a leadership position.

2021 Compensation Decisions. In early 2021, we determined to forego salary increases for any of our NEOs for 2021 in light of the ongoing pandemic and economic uncertainty. In addition, we anticipate that our 2021 annual incentive program will revert to its historical design rather than utilizing the modified design adopted in 2020 in response to the pandemic. We also anticipate maintaining our customary performance-oriented long-term incentive design for our equity awards in 2021.

Connecting Pay and Performance

In 2020, Stock Yards Bancorp continued to generate performance superior to a substantial majority of our peer companies as measured by key metrics. Our record of consistently higher financial performance has in turn driven our long-term shareholder returns to impressive levels relative to our peers. Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, a substantial portion of annual target total direct compensation is variable, at-risk pay. We consider compensation to be “at risk” and performance-based if it is subject to operating performance or if its value depends on stock price appreciation.

The following charts demonstrate the positioning of our ROAA and ROAE compared to the peer group described on page 29 over each of the last five years. As shown below, our ROAE ranked in the top 10% of our peer group in every one of the last five years, and our ROAA ranked in the top 10% of the peer group every year except 2020. Our ROAA in 2020 was negatively impacted by the Company’s election to adopt CECL and the outsized balance sheet growth attributed to lower-yielding loans under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). In addition, our average ROAA over that five-year period was in the 99th percentile of our peer group, and our ROAE over that period was higher than that of any of our peers.

graph04.jpg

graph05.jpg

25

The following chart compares our five-year total shareholder return (TSR) to the median TSR of our compensation peer group and an additional industry peer group.

graph06.jpg

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence. Market pricing data as of December 31, 2020.

 

(1)

Net income for the year 2017 reflected a non-cash charge of $5.9 million or $0.25 per diluted share to revalue the Company’s net deferred tax asset in connection with federal income tax legislation enacted on December 22, 2017.

(2)

The $5.9 million charge described above reduced 2017 ROAE 1.81% and ROAA 0.20%.

The Company’s 2017 ROAA continued our trend of significantly outperforming similar community banks, as measured by our compensation peer group (see page 29 for a listing of the compensation peer group). The following chart illustrates the Company ROAA compared to that of its compensation peer group.

  

Compensation Peer Group

  

Stock Yards Bancorp

 

2017 ROAA

  0.83%  0.97%  1.02%  1.25% 

Percentile

  25th   50th   75th   94th 

The Company’s actual performance in 2017 represents a 29% premium on earnings measured against the peer median.


Additionally, the graphs below illustrate superior long-term performance of the Company.

      

         

(1)

Diluted EPS for 2017 was $1.66 which included a $5.9 million or $0.25 per diluted share non-cash charge to revalue the Company’s net deferred tax asset in connection with enactment of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act in December, 2017. The graph above reflects both EPS in accordance with US GAAP and adjusted diluted earnings per share, a non-GAAP financial measure.

The following table provides a reconciliation of diluted earnings per share for 2017, in accordance with US GAAP, to adjusted diluted earnings per share, a non-GAAP financial measure, which excludes the effect of the $5.9 million non-cash charge included in 2017 net income to revalue the Company’s deferred tax asset in conjunction with enactment of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act in December 2017. The Company provides this reconciliation to demonstrate the effect of tax reform on 2017 diluted earnings per share.

Net income per share, diluted, as reported

 $1.66 

Per share effect of tax reform

  0.25 

Adjusted net income per share, diluted, excluding the effect of tax reform

 $1.91 


Mix of Pay

We believe that our executive compensation program strikes a very appropriate balance between fixed and variable pay as well as short and long-term pay. The charts below represent the mix of 2017 direct compensation at Target and Maximum performance.

2017Target Compensation

           

2017Maximum Compensation

          

As demonstrated above, variable pay at Target for the CEO represents 52% of direct compensation. However, when the Bank performs at Maximum, payouts for variable pay significantly increase commensurate with that outperformance. Short-term cash compensation can maximize at 100% of base salary and long-term equity awards maximize at 130% of base salary for the CEO. At Maximum, base salary, or fixed pay, represents 31% of direct compensation for the CEO, while variable, or at-risk pay, represents 69% of direct compensation, clearly rewarding superior performance.

Say On Pay Results

At the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, 97.3% of the votes were cast in favor of the advisory vote to approve executive compensation, commonly known as “Say on Pay”. This vote is consistent with the 2016 Say on Pay result. The Committee believes its compensations practices are properly aligned with the interests of shareholders and that the high level of shareholder support of our 2017 Say on Pay proposal indicates that most shareholders share the Committee’s view.


Recently Adopted Governance Best Practices

The Committee continually reviews its policies and procedures to ensure they are consistent with strong corporate governance guidelines. This also includes education around governance best practices and their bearing on the Company.

In 2018, the Committee approved an amendment to the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan to allow dividends to accrue but prohibit payment of dividends on nonvested equity awards. Also in 2018, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee amended the provisions of the Company’s corporate governance guidelines regarding independent director common stock ownership requirements. The revised guidelines require new directors to join the Board with the greater of 1,000 shares or $50,000 of Company stock and own Company stock valued at $200,000 or more within three years of joining.

Beginning with grants made in 2015, all of our performance share grant agreements were modified to require all NEOs to hold any shares earned after the three year performance period for a period of 12 months (net of shares withheld for taxes). We instituted this policy to further encourage an ownership culture among our executive team, and to enhance long-term alignment between executives and shareholders.

Connecting Pay and Performance

As shown throughout this document, Stock Yards Bancorp continues to be one of the top-performing banks in the country with regard to generating corporate profits for shareholders. In conjunction, our shareholders have been rewarded with superior results over the long term. In particular, our three and ten-year total shareholder returns have outpaced the banking market as well as the broader market. In spite of this strong long-term performance, the Company’s TSR performance over the one-year period ended December 31, 2017 did lag its peers. We believe this stock price underperformance was significantly driven by an unusual run up in our stock price in late 2016 which produced an unsustainable 90.6% total return for 2016. While the community banking market as a whole experienced significant stock price appreciation in late 2016, the increase in Stock Yard’s price was significantly higher than peers and contributed to our larger price decline in 2017.

The 10-year TSR is especially indicative of strong long-term performance, in that it covers a complete financial cycle, beginning before the 2008 financial crisis and includes results through and following the crisis. As the table below indicates, our shareholders have earned strong returns over medium and long-term time horizons.

  

Median Total Shareholder Return of Peer Groups (1)

 
  

One Year

Ended

December 31, 2017

  

Three Year

Ended

December 31, 2017

  

Ten Year

Ended

December 31, 2017

 
             

Compensation Peer Group (2)

  4.7%  65.8%  137.8%

Midwest banks $1.5-$6.0 billion in assets (3)

  3.7%  78.4%  169.9%

Nationwide banks $1.5-$6.0 billion in assets (4)

  4.1%  66.9%  128.3%

SYBT

  (18.0)%  82.0%  213.7%

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence. Market pricing data as of 12/29/17.

(1)

Total Return equals the return of a security over a period, including price appreciation and the reinvestment of dividends. Dividends are assumed to be reinvested at the closing price of the security on the ex-date of the dividend.

(2)

See page 29 for a listing of the compensation peer group. Excludes five banks in the original peer group that no longer meet selection criteria.

(3)

MidwestNationwide peers representing 36163 major exchange-traded banks (Nasdaq,(NASDAQ, NYSE and NYSE Mkt) headquartered in the Midwest with total assets between $1.5B and $6.0B. Excludes merger targets.

(4)

Nationwide peers representing 134 major exchange-traded banks (Nasdaq, NYSE and NYSE Mkt)NYSEAM) headquartered in the U.S. with total assets between $1.5B$1.5 and $6.0B.$7.0 billion. Excludes merger targets.


 

The Committee believes stock price followsclosely mirrors earnings growth over the long term,long-term, and management should be incented with respect to performance measures related to the operations of the Company. Over the short term, stock price is not controllable by management and should not be a tool to judge management’s performance. Often, price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios expand or contract based on economic and broad market conditions, and the entire financial services sector is impacted to some degree. We believe our earnings per shareEPS growth aligns management’s interests with shareholders and drives total return over the long term.

 

Additionally, the Committee believes that it uses appropriately challenging targets in setting goals for both short-term and long-term incentives, and that the Company’s financial results must farsignificantly exceed peer median performance in order to achieve Target-leveltarget-level awards. For example, under the Company’s performance share goals, executives do not achieve Targettarget award vesting unless our ROAA exceeds the 7585th percentile of our comparator group (which is comprised of all publicpublicly-traded banks with $1.5 to $6.0$7.0 billion in assets), and no awards are earned if our ROAA does not exceed the 5080th percentile of our comparator group.

 

Say-on-Pay Results

At the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, 97.4% of the votes were cast in favor of the advisory vote to approve executive compensation, commonly known as “say-on-pay.” This vote is consistent with the 2019 result. The Committee believes its compensation practices are properly aligned with the interests of shareholders, and that the high level of shareholder support of our 2020 say-on-pay proposal indicates that most shareholders share the Committee’s view.

26

 

Compensation Philosophy and ProcessProgram Governance

 

Objective ofThe Committee continually reviews its policies and procedures to ensure they are consistent with strong corporate governance guidelines. This also includes education around governance best practices and their bearing on the Company’s Compensation Program and its executive compensation program.

What We Do:

What We Dont Do:

Align pay and performance

No guaranteed bonuses – incentive compensation may be reduced to zero if financial metrics are not met

Engage an independent third-party compensation consultant for advice in making compensation decisions

No highly leveraged incentive plans that encourage excessive risk taking

Review compensation data from peers whose industry, revenues, and footprint share similarities with the Company

No uncapped incentive award payouts

Conduct an annual shareholder say-on-pay vote

No excessive perquisites for our directors and executive officers

Maintain additional holding requirements of one year once equity awards vest

No payment of dividends on unvested equity awards

Maintain stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and directors

No repricing of options or SARs without prior shareholder approval

Maintain a clawback policy

No excise tax gross ups

II.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our compensation philosophy guides the design and decisions of our compensation program is designed to achieve the following objectives:

 

 

To attract, retain, and motivate top executive talent;

 

To link overall compensation to company performance;

 

To align executive interests with shareholder interests;interests;

 

To place at risk a significant portion of total compensation at risk, making it contingent on Company performance while remaining consistent with our risk management policies; and

 

To support the Company’sCompany’s objective of creating shareholder value without taking unnecessary risks.

 

The Committee believes that Bancorp’sthe Company’s pay policies and practices do not create risks reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

III.

Compensation Determination Process

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee assists our Board in establishing our compensation philosophy and determining the compensation of our executive officers. The CompensationCommittee is also responsible for determining the structure and components of our programs, as well as reviewing and approving the compensation of the NEOs, or recommending it for approval by the Board of Directors. The Committee is responsible for annually assessing the performance of the eight executive officers, including the NEOs, and for determining their annual salary, incentive (short- and long-term) compensation goals and payout/grant levels. Each of the threefour members of our Compensation Committee is independent as is defined under NASDAQ listing standards.

27

The Committee held eight meetings during 2020, and its actions included finalizing all aspects of 2020 executive compensation. The Committee:

● 

Reviewed its compensation philosophy

● 

Conducted an annual performance evaluation of our CEO

Reviewed appropriate actions to take in light of the COVID-19 pandemic

● 

Reviewed the Committee charter

● 

Reviewed the Company’s 2020 operating budget and its effect on incentive compensation programs for 2020 (including setting the EPS benchmarks for short-term compensation payouts)

● 

Established the performance-based metrics and targets for the annual incentive plans

● 

Established the design, award mix and performance goals for the long-term incentive plan

● 

Evaluated achievement relative to performance targets, and determined and certified corresponding incentive payouts

● 

Reviewed and updated the stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers

● 

Discussed executive succession planning

● 

Reviewed the Company-wide retirement plan programs, and

● 

Received education on compensation trends, compliance issues and best practices from the Committee’s compensation consultants, McLagan.

Ultimately, the Committee’s decisions are based on a variety of factors, including short- and long-term Company performance, the officer’s level of responsibility, an assessment of individual performance, and competitive market data.

Role of Executives in Compensation Committee retainsDeliberations

The Committee works closely with the CEO, and the CEO attends Committee meetings to discuss the Company’s compensation and performance matters, particularly as it relates to the other executive officers. For each executive officer other than himself, the CEO presents annual evaluations of such officers and makes recommendations to the Committee regarding their compensation. This assessment considers such factors as our achievement of goals related to corporate, division, function individual performance. Our CEO does not play any role with respect to any matter affecting his own compensation and is not present when the Committee discusses and formulates its compensation recommendation for the CEO. The Committee reviews recommendations made by its CEO and information from the executive compensation consultant review. The Committee sets the compensation for our CEO and each of our NEOs at its meetings in the first quarter of each year and subsequently reports its compensation decisions to the full Board of Directors.

The general counsel of the Company works with the Committee Chair to provide administrative support and, along with other executives, provide pertinent financial, tax, accounting, or operational information. Other executives, such as those from human resources or finance, may attend meetings from time-to-time to provide their insights and suggestions on pertinent topics. Only Committee members may vote on decisions regarding executive compensation. The Committee regularly conducts a portion of its business in executive session.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The Committee views it as important to obtain objective, independent expertise and advice in carrying out its responsibilities, and has the power to retain an independent compensation consultant to assist it in the performance of its duties and responsibilities. The Committee has retained an independent executive compensation consultant to assist in evaluating the compensation practices at the Company and to provide advice and ongoing recommendations regarding executive compensation consistent with our business goals and pay philosophy.

 

In 2016,2020, the Compensation Committee engagedcontinued to engage McLagan, which is part of the Rewards Solutions practice at Aon plc, to provide executive compensation consulting services regarding our 2017 compensation programs and pay levels. The scope of McLagan’s executive compensation consulting assignment included the ongoing evaluation of the appropriateness of our peer group of banks as well as a comparison of management’s base salaries, annual cash incentive awards and equity-based compensation to those paid by the banks in the peer bank group (see page 29).group. The Compensation Committee used data developed by McLagan inamong the various factors that informed its determination of overall competitive pay practices.executive officer pay. While the Committee takes into consideration the review and recommendations of McLagan when making decisions about our executive compensation program, ultimately, the Committee makes its own independent decisions about compensation matters.

 

28

McLagan

McLagan reports directly to and performed services solely on behalf of the Compensation Committee and has no other relationship with Bancorpthe Company or its management. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of McLagan consistent with SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards and has concluded that McLagan’s work did not involve any conflicts of interest.


Compensation Committee Actions

The Compensation Committee held six meetings during 2017, and its actions included finalizing all aspects of 2017 executive compensation based on recommendations made by McLagan. In addition, the Committee reviewed its compensation philosophy with McLagan, reviewed the Committee charter, reviewed the company-wide retirement plan programs, reviewed the 2018 Bancorp operating budget and its effect on incentive compensation programs for 2018 (including setting the EPS benchmarks for short-term compensation payouts), discussed executive succession planning, and received education on compensation trends, compliance issues and best practices.

 

Role of Executives in Compensation Committee Deliberations

The Compensation Committee works closely with the CEO, who provides administrative support to the Compensation Committee. The CEO attends Compensation Committee meetings to discuss Bancorp’s compensation and performance matters. The general counsel of Bancorp works with the Committee Chair to provide administrative support and, along with other executives, provide pertinent financial, tax, accounting, or operational information. Executives in attendance may provide their insights and suggestions, but only Compensation Committee members may vote on decisions regarding executive compensation. The Committee regularly conducts a portion of its business in executive session.

For each executive officer other than himself, the CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding base salary. The Compensation Committee reviews recommendations made by the CEO and information from the executive compensation consultant review. The Committee’s decisions are based on a variety of factors, including short- and long-term Company performance, the officer’s level of responsibility, an assessment of individual performance, and competitive market data.

Peer Selection Process

Each year, the Compensation Committee re-evaluates and updates the peer group, with the consultant’s guidance, to ensure ongoing relevance. The Compensation Committee uses this information for making compensation decisions, such as changes to base salaries, annual cash incentive awards, and long-term equity awards.

 

For 20172020 compensation, the Committee worked with the consultant in 20162019 to select peer banks using the following criteria:criteria as of March 31, 2019. The chosen criteria were essentially consistent with the prior year:

 

Located in the continental United States;States excluding California;

 

Total revenue from $80 to $300 million;

● 

Total assets less than $7$7 billion;

 

Total revenue from $50 to $300 million;

Location in a metropolitan area with a population of 200,000 or more. Bancorp competes against money center, regional, and community banks in its three primary markets. Competition for talented executives is greater in larger markets than in smaller communities, which often drives higher levels of compensation in those larger markets;

Insider ownership less than 35% with no single holder owning more than 15%. Certain banks comparable in size to Bancorp are controlled by a family or other group and pay for top executives may not be indicative of market conditions if the executive is also a substantial owner;;

 

Non-interest income greater than 12.5%15% of revenue with WM&T revenue greater than $3.0 million. Bancorp has a large portion of non-interest income earned by its WM&T business;total revenue;

 

Market capitalization greater than $100$350 million;

 

Non-performing assets / total assets less than 3.0%; and

 

Return on average assets greater than .5%0.5%.

 


Based on these criteria, four companies were removed from the peer group used for 2020 compensation decisions: Heritage Financial Corp., Great Southern Bancorp Inc., Access National Corp. and, Peoples Utah Bancorp. Two new companies met the criteria and were added to the peer group: National Bank Holdings Corp. and HomeTrust Bancshares Inc.

 

The table below lists the peer banks approved by the Compensation Committee for 2017.2020:

 

Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation Pennsylvania (BMTC)

OrrstownOld Second Bancorp Inc.

Carolina Financial Services, Inc., Pennsylvania (ORRF)Corporation

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

City Holding Company West Virginia (CHCO)

Park Sterling Corporation, North Carolina (PSTB)

CoBiz Financial Inc., Colorado (COBZ)

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation, New Jersey (PGC)

Enterprise Bancorp, Inc., Massachusetts (EBTC)

QCR Holdings, Inc., Illinois (QCRH)

Enterprise Financial Services Missouri (EFSC)Corp.

Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc., Maryland (SASR)Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida

Farmers National Banc Corp., Ohio (FMNB)

Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida, Florida (SBCF)

First Busey Corporation, Illinois (BUSE)

Southside Bancshares, Inc., Texas (SBSI)

MerchantsHomeTrust Bancshares Inc., Vermont (MBVT)

United Community Financial Corp.

Independent Bank Corp.

Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania (UVSP)

National Bank Holdings Corp.

Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Nicolet Bankshares, Inc., Wisconsin (NCBS)

Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc., Rhode Island (WASH)

Old Second Bancorp Inc., Illinois (OSBC)

WSFS Financial Corporation, Delaware (WSFS)

 

 TheOur total revenue, asset size, net income and market capitalization and that of the Peer Grouppeer group as of Decemberthe March 31 2017 compared to our asset size, net income and market capitalization isst, 2019 peer group effective date are set forth in the table below. Merchants Bancshares and Park Sterling Corporation were acquired in 2017 and thus are excluded from thefollowing table.

 

Peer Bank

 

Total Assets (1)

  

Net Income (1)

  

Market Capitalization (1)

 
  

As of year

end 2017

  

For year
ended 201
7

  

As of year

end 2017

 

Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation

 $4,450  $23.0  $891.2 

City Holding Company

  4,132   54.3   1,053.8 

CoBiz Financial Inc.

  3,846   32.9   843.9 

Enterprise Bancorp, Inc.

  2,818   19.4   395.3 

Enterprise Financial Services

  5,289   48.2   1,042.5 

Farmers National Banc Corp.

  2,159   22.7   406.3 

First Busey Corporation

  7,861   62.7   1,457.6 

Nicolet Bankshares, Inc.

  2,932   33.4   537.4 

Old Second Bancorp, Inc.

  2,383   15.1   404.4 

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.

  1,559   8.9   210.8 

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

  4,261   36.5   652.1 

QCR Holdings, Inc.

  3,983   35.7   596.4 

Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc.

  5,447   53.2   936.3 

Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida

  5,810   42.9   1,182.8 

Southside Bancshares, Inc.

  6,498   54.3   1,178.8 

Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania

  4,560   44.1   822.8 

Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.

  4,530   45.89   917.3 

WSFS Financial Corporation

  6,997   59.6   1,503.4 

Median

 $4,356  $39.7  $867.6 

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

 $3,235  $38.0  $855.0 
29

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence 

Peer Bank Name, Ticker, State

 

Total

Revenue

  

Total Assets

  

Net Income

  

Market

Capitalization

 
  

Dollars in millions

 

Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation (BMTC) PA

 $225  $4,632  $59,183  $729 

Carolina Financial Corporation (CARO) SC

  175   3,482   60,159   771 

City Holding Company (CHCO) WV

  208   4,917   74,005   1,256 

Enterprise Financial Services Corp. (EFSC) MO

  236   6,932   84,452   1,096 

Farmers National Banc Corp. (FMNB) OH

  106   2,356   32,084   383 

HomeTrust Bancshares Inc. (HTBI) NC

  127   3,458   26,340   460 

Independent Bank Corp. (IBCP) MI

  163   3,384   40,059   507 

National Bank Holdings Corp. (NBHC) CO

  271   5,803   71,909   1,033 

Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. (NCBS) WI

  147   3,041   41,726   564 

Old Second Bancorp Inc. (OSBC) IL

  125   2,624   40,668   376 

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) NJ

  163   4,662   44,788   510 

QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH) IL

  192   5,067   45,507   534 

Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida (SBCF) FL

  273   6,783   71,953   1,355 

Southside Bancshares, Inc. (SBSI) TX

  210   6,217   76,704   1,120 

United Community Financial Corp. (UCFC) OH

  112   2,852   35,728   457 

Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania (UVSP) PA

  224   5,036   53,772   716 

Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) RI

  197   5,035   69,716   833 

Median

 $192  $4,662  $53,772  $716 

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

 $162  $3,281  $57,755  $772 

 

On a total asset basis, Bancorp is smaller thanFive banks in the medianoriginal peer group no longer meet the selection criteria of the peer group; however, on net incomegroup due to merger and market capitalization the Company approximates the median. On a ROAAacquisition activity and ROAE basis as shown below, Bancorp ranks well above the 90th percentile ofare thus omitted from the peer group. For 2017performance comparisons shown in this proxy statement. Those five former peers are Carolina Financial Corp., Enterprise Financial Services, Seacoast Banking Corp. of FL, Southside Bancschares, Inc. and consistently for many years, Bancorp performed at or near the 90th percentile of not only this peer group but a broader peer group of similar sized banks.United Community Financial Corp.

 

  

Total Assets (1)

  

ROAA

  

ROAE

 

25th percentile

 $3,161   0.83%  8.21%

50th percentile

 $4,356   0.97%  9.05%

75th percentile

 $5,408   1.02%  10.12%

Stock Yards Bancorp

 $3,235   1.25%  11.61%

(1)

Dollars in millions


Benchmarking 2017Referencing the Competitive Market in Determining 2020 Compensation

 

The Compensation Committee considers a number of factors in determining appropriate pay levels and plan designs for our executive officers.NEOs. These factors include competitive compensation data from peer companies and the banking market in general. The Compensation Committee does not view competitive market prescriptively or tie the compensation levels of our executives to specific market percentiles. Instead, the Committee applies judgment and discretion in establishing targeted pay levels, taking into accountconsidering not only competitive market data, but also factors such as company, business unit and individual performance, scope of responsibility, internal pay equity, skill sets, leadership potential and succession planning.

 

Mix of Pay

We believe that our executive compensation program strikes an appropriate balance between fixed and variable pay as well as between short and long-term pay. The following charts for our CEO and our other NEOs illustrate the target compensation established in early 2020, consisting of base salary, annual incentive awards, and long-term equity-based compensation granted in 2020.

30

graph07.jpg

Name

 

Salary

  

Target Bonus

%

  

Target

Bonus

  

PSUs

  

SARs

  

Total

 

Hillebrand

 $560,000   50% $280,000  $252,000  $84,000  $1,176,000 

Poindexter

  396,000   40%  158,400   142,560   47,520   744,480 

Thompson

  364,000   35%  127,400   114,660   38,220   644,280 

Stinnett

  317,000   35%  110,950   99,855   33,285   561,090 

Dishman

  289,000   30%  86,700   78,030   26,010   479,740 

As demonstrated above, variable pay at target for the CEO represents 52% of direct compensation. However, when the Bank performs at maximum, payouts for variable pay significantly increase commensurate with that outperformance.

As discussed elsewhere, the award opportunities under our cash incentive plan were reduced during 2020 in response to the pandemic, which had the effect of de-emphasizing cash incentives within the overall 2020 executive compensation program.

Each compensation element is discussed in more detail below and outlined in more detail in the 2020 Summary Compensation ComponentsTable and 2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table appearing on pages 41 and 43 of this proxy statement.

31

IV.

Components of Our Compensation Program

 

Compensation

Component

Purpose

Link to Performance

Fixed or
Performance
Based

Short
or
Long-term

Base salary

AttractProvide stable compensation and attract and retain executives through market competitive payments

Based on each executive's performance and responsibilities. Used as a basis for short and long-term incentive award goals.goals

Fixed

Short-term

Cash incentives

RewardIncentivize and reward executives for achievement of certain annual financial goals

Incentives are 100% quantitative to goals important for near term financial success. Includes a measurement of our corporate performance for all executives, as well as business line performance for certain executives.executives

Performance

Short-term

Performance stock units

Reward executives for sustained long-term performance while aligning the value of awards with the success of our shareholders

Awards vest based on achievement of three-year goals on EPS growth and ReturnROAA versus peers. Three-year performance period plus an additional one-year mandatory holding period on Assets versus peers.vested awards

Performance

Long-term

Stock appreciation rights

Align interests of executives with shareholders by rewarding increases in our stock price.price

Awards only have value if stock price increases. Awards vest over five years

Performance

Long-term

Other executive
compensation

Primarily Company-matching retirement contributions

Success of Company allows it to approve benefit plan matching levels.

Linked to performance

Short and long-term

 

Base Salary

 

We provide a base salary as the fundamental element of executive compensation. In support of our focus to attract and retain top talent, our philosophy is to pay base salaries that are within a competitive range of market practice. Individual pay will vary within the range depending on each executive’s position, performance, experience, and contribution. Salaries are the basis from which incentives and other select benefits are derived. Base salary increases ranged from zero to 3.7% depending on changes to market data, the time since the executive received a salary adjustment and other factors.

 

Executive

 

2019

Base Salary

  

2020

Base Salary

  

Increase/Decrease

 

Hillebrand

 $540,000  $560,000   3.7%

Poindexter

  385,000   396,000   2.9%

Stinnett

  314,000   317,000   1.0%

Thompson

  364,000   364,000   0%

Dishman

  286,000   289,000   1.0%

 

Executive

 

2016

Base Salary

  

2017

Base Salary

  

Percentage

Change

 

Heintzman

 $550,000  $561,000   2.0% 

Davis

 $270,000  $280,000   3.7% 

Hillebrand

 $400,000  $400,000   0.0% 

Thompson

 $360,000  $360,000   0.0% 

Poindexter

 $300,000  $300,000   0.0% 


32

 

Short-Term Cash Incentives

The objective of annual cash incentive compensation is to deliver variable compensation that is conditioned on the attainment of certain financial, departmental and/or operating results of Bancorp.the Company. Therefore, the Committee established an incentive program based upon the achievement of certain earnings per shareEPS goals as well as line of business goals applicable to specific officers’ duties. The table below summarizesduties and employs a rigorous process to set the short-term incentive targets and actual payments for 2017 performance.

  

Target % of Base

Salary

  

Target $

  

Actual Earned

 

Heintzman

  50%  $280,500  $336,600 

Davis

  30%  $84,000  $100,800 

Hillebrand

  40%  $160,000  $192,000 

Thompson

  35%  $126,000  $141,750 

Poindexter

  35%  $105,000  $78,630 

Mr. Heintzman, Ms. Davis and Mr. Hillebrandperformance targets.

 

For 2017,2020, the Committee amended the EPS measurement to “adjusted” EPS rather than budget EPS as was used in the past. This change was instituted to recognize slower earnings growth that was anticipated in 2020 due to new accounting rules associated with Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) over which management has little or no control. Like many of its peer banks, the Company adopted ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, as amended, effective in 2020. ASC 326 as amended replaced “incurred loss” methodology for recognizing credit losses with a CECL model, which requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The COVID-19 pandemic had significant effects on our customer businesses and their debt service capabilities, and consequently on related loan loss provisions as evaluated under ASC 326 and CECL provisioning that more closely relates to forecasted unemployment and not customer business. Despite this impact, the Committee is committed to setting aggressive targets for management as it has done in the past.

The target performance goal for 2020 was revised below the prior year amount in recognition of unique circumstances driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. The goal nevertheless required strong performance to achieve target payouts even after the COVID-related adjustments. As the effects of the pandemic became clear and provided the Committee with a view of the potential financial impact, specifically that anticipated financial results were likely not to be reflective of core operating performance, the Committee made further adjustments to shift the EPS metric from an adjusted EPS amount to a pre-provision amount for the full year. Provision is the aspect of performance that is most volatile and most materially affected by COVID-19 in 2020. In light of this change, and in recognition of shareholder expectations and views on mid-cycle changes, the Committee also reduced each payout opportunity level by 50% in recognition of the adjusted metric in an unprecedented year. Goals for line of business executives such as Ms. Thompson, were unchanged but the line of business component was lowered by 25%. These decisions drove short-term incentive payouts to range from 100% to 192% of target, depending on the individual.

We anticipate that our 2021 annual incentive program will revert to its historical design rather than utilizing the modified design adopted in 2020 in response to the pandemic.

Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and Dishman

For 2020, the determination as to whether cash incentives would be paid to Mr. HeintzmanMessrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and two non-line of business executive officers, Ms. Davis and Mr. Hillebrand,Dishman was based solely upon the achievement of diluted earnings per share (“EPS”)EPS objectives as set forth below.

 

The Committee strongly supports the use of EPS exclusively in the determining short-term cash incentiveincentives for certain executives without specific line of business oversight. The Committee believes that EPS, over the long-term, drives total shareholder return.TSR as it represents the culmination of executive officers’ efforts regarding profitability, revenue growth, expense control, risk profile and other elements. Oftentimes, boards use several goals to focus management on specific operational objectives while also balancing credit quality and other risks. With virtually all areas of the Company operating at high performance levels and operating ratios at superior levels, growth in EPS should be, and is, the primary focus of the management team. Establishing the appropriate mix of revenue growth, expense control measures, risk profile and other tactics are areas that management has control over and that should result in higher EPS over time. Therefore, the Committee believes aligning pay with EPS growth gives management the appropriate incentive to make the best decisions.

 

Target performance level for the diluted EPS goal represented a 4.4% increase in diluted EPS over 2016. With the Company’s ROAA performance historically being above the 90th percentile of peers, the Committee believed these goals to be appropriately challenging. As the Committee was setting incentive goals for 2017, they believed it to be prudent to exclude the effect, positive or negative, on EPS incentive goal achievement of any change in federal income tax law in 2017.


33

 

The annual cash incentive formula includes increasingly higher payout percentages for corresponding higher adjusted EPS levels, further reinforcing the Committee’sCommittee’s pay-for-performance philosophy. EPS targets, year-over-year EPS growth rates and corresponding bonus percentages for 20172020 were as follows:

 

 

Bancorp

      

Bonus as a Percentage of Base Salary

 
 

EPS (1)

  

EPS Growth

  

Mr. Heintzman

  

Ms. Davis

  

Mr. Hillebrand

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonus as a Percentage of Base Salary

                     

Adjusted EPS ($)

 

EPS
Growth
2020/2019

 

Mr.

Hillebrand

 

Mr.
Poindexter

 

Mr.

Stinnett

 

Mr.
Dishman

Threshold

 $1.80   0.0%  10%  6%  8%

 

2.63

 

 

-3.3

%

 

10

%

 

8

%

 

7

%

 

6

%

 $1.82   1.1%  20%  12%  16%
 $1.84   2.2%  30%  18%  24%
 $1.86   3.3%  40%  24%  32%

Target

 $1.88   4.4%  50%  30%  40%

 

2.72

 

 

0.0

%

 

50

%

 

40

%

 

35

%

 

30

%

 $1.90   5.6%  60%  36%  48%
 $1.92   6.7%  70%  42%  56%
 $1.94   7.8%  80%  48%  64%
 $1.96   8.9%  90%  54%  72%

Maximum

 

$

1.98 or greater   10.0%  100%  60%  80%

 

2.84

 or greater

 

4.4

%

 

100

%

 

80

%

 

70

%

 

60

%

Actual Results

 $1.91 (1)   6.1%  60%  36%  48%

 

(1)   Per plan parametersThe Committee set the target at a level that it considered rigorous and challenging and took into account the relevant risks and opportunities. More specifically, the Committee reviewed the relevant financial objectives set as a result of the detailed budgeting process, and assessed various factors related to the achievability of these budget targets, including the risks associated with various macroeconomic factors and the risks of achieving specific actions that underlie the targets and the implied performance relative to prior years. Considering these factors, the Committee initially set the 2020 target performance level for the diluted EPS goal at $2.72, equal to the 2019 adjusted EPS result of $2.72 which included a one-time adjustment due to a change in state tax laws, and 8% above the net income effect2019 target of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on 2017 EPS was excluded from the 2017 EPS goals. Actual EPS was $1.66 after a $0.25 charge to revalue the Company’s net deferred tax assets.$2.52.

 

For 2017, based on these EPS results, the following incentive payments were made:


Name

 

2017 Base
Salary

  

Incentive
Percentage

  

Incentive
Payment

 

Heintzman

 $561,000   60%  $336,600 

Davis

 $280,000   36%  $100,800 

Hillebrand

 $400,000   48%  $192,000 

Ms. Thompson

 

Ms. Thompson’sThompson’s short-term incentive includes three components: departmental gross revenues,net new business, income before overhead allocations and taxes, and consolidated EPS of the Company. The net new business component replaced the former goal tied to gross revenue. The change was made to link her bonus to new business generation and retention, factors which are more closely under her influence while adding focus on new business generation as a key metric.

 

We believe it is important for Ms. Thompson to have both line of business and overall bank performance components to her short-term incentive plan as growth in departmental profitability directly affects the profitability of the Company and significantly enhances shareholder value. Not only is the WM&T departmentAs a significant contributor to EPS, but the business referrals from this department to other lines of business are significant; therefore,result, the Committee believes Ms. Thompson should share inbe partly measured on the overall success of the Company. Ms. Thompson’s incentive is weighted 75% for her line of business and 25% for overall Company performance, and the Compensation Committee considers her line of business goals to be appropriately challenging to attain. The matrix used to compute the incentive award, shown below, is structured such that achievement of target performance in all categories results in a cash incentive equal to 35% of base salary. Respective targets and corresponding bonus percentages for Ms. Thompson’s line of business components are as follows:

 


Line of Business Component

 

 

Gross revenues

  

Income before overhead allocation and taxes

 
 

Percentage

  

Bonus as

  

Percentage

  

Bonus as

 
 

Increase over

  

Percentage

  

Increase over

  

Percentage

  

Net New Business

  

Income Before Overhead Allocation and Taxes

 
 

Prior Year

  

of Base Salary

  

Prior Year

  

of Base Salary

  

Net New

Business (50%

of WM&T

Performance)

  

Bonus as

Percentage

of

Base Salary

  

Percentage

Increase over

Prior Year

  

Bonus as

Percentage

of Base

Salary

 

Threshold

  1%    2.625%    1%    2.625%   $650,000   2.625

%

  2.5

%

  2.625

%

  3%    5.250%    2%    5.250%  
  4%    7.875%    3%    7.875%  
  5%    10.500%    4%    10.500%  

Target

  6%    13.125%    5%    13.125%    850,000   13.125

%

  7

%

  13.125

%

  7%    15.750%    6%    15.750%  
  8%    18.375%    7%    18.375%  
  9%    21.000%    8%    21.000%  
  10%    23.625%    9%    23.625%  

Maximum

 

 

11% or greater   26.250%   

10%

 or greater   26.250%    1,100,000   26.25

%

  11.5

%

  26.25

%

Actual Results

  7%    15.750%    5%    13.125%    1,200,000   26.25

%

  10.6

%

  23.63

%

 

34

 

EPS Component

 

        Bonus as 
  

Bancorp

  

EPS

  

Percentage of

 
  

EPS (1)

  

Growth

  

Base Salary

 

Threshold

 $1.80   0.0%    1.75%  
  $1.82   1.1%    3.50%  
  $1.84   2.2%    5.25%  
  $1.86   3.3%    7.00%  

Target

 $1.88   4.4%    8.75%  
  $1.90   5.6%    10.50%  
  $1.92   6.7%    12.25%  
  $1.94   7.8%    14.00%  
  $1.96   8.9%    15.75%  

Maximum

 

$

1.98 or greater   10.0%    17.50%  

Actual Results

 $1.91   6.1%    10.50%  

(1) Per plan parameters detailed above, the net income effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on 2017 EPS was excluded from the 2017 EPS goals. Actual EPS was $1.66 after a $0.25 charge to revalue the Company’s net deferred tax assets.

 

EPS ($)

EPS

Growth

Bonus as

Percentage of

Base Salary

Threshold

2.63

 

-3.3

%

1.75

%

Target

2.72

 

0.0

%

8.75

%

Maximum

2.84

or greater

4.4

%

17.50

%

 

 

COVID-related Adjustments to Short-Term Cash Incentives and Payouts

As the effects of the pandemic unfolded, it became clear to the Committee that our Threshold level of corporate EPS under our annual incentive plan would likely not be attained due primarily to increased loan loss provision, and that annual incentive payments for at least four of our executives would be eliminated entirely. The Committee did not believe that our strong core operating performance warranted elimination of annual incentive payouts. Therefore, on September 15, 2020 the Committee made the decision to shift the EPS targets from an adjusted EPS amount to a pre-provision amount for the full year. Provision is the aspect of performance that is most volatile and most materially affected by COVID in 2020. The target performance level for the pre-provision EPS goal incorporated the company’s budgeted earnings for the full-year less budgeted provision. In summary,this way, the Committee revised the specific profitability measure under the plan but did not revise budgeted profitability from that initially expected at the beginning of the year.

In light of this change, and in recognition of shareholder expectations and views of mid-cycle changes, the Committee also reduced each payout opportunity level by 50% for four of our NEOs.

Pre-provision EPS targets, lowered bonus percentages and actual results for 2020 were as follows:

 

 

 

Bonus as a Percentage of Base Salary

 

Pre-Provision EPS ($)

Mr.

Hillebrand

Mr.
Poindexter

Mr.

Stinnett

Mr.
Dishman

Threshold

2.80

 

5

%

4

%

3.5

%

3

%

Target

2.89

 

25

%

20

%

17.5

%

15

%

Maximum

3.01

or greater

50

%

40

%

35

%

30

%

Actual Results 

$3.17 

 

50 

% 

40

% 

35

%

30

%

The following table summarizes the revised short-term incentive opportunities (adjusted for COVID) and actual payments made for 2020 performance.

  

% of Base Salary

  

Potential Payout Amounts ($)

  

Actual

 
  

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  Earned ($) 

Hillebrand

  5

%

  25

%

  50

%

 $28,000  $140,000  $280,000  $280,000 

Poindexter

  4

%

  20

%

  40

%

  15,840   79,200   158,400   158,400 

Stinnett

  4

%

  18

%

  35

%

  11,095   55,475   110,950   110,950 

Dishman

  3

%

  15

%

  30

%

  8,670   43,350   86,700   86,700 

35

Goals for line of business executives such as Ms. Thompson were unchanged, but the line of business component was lowered by 25%. The following details the components of Ms. Thompson’s 2017Thompson’s 2020 short term cash incentive.incentive as a percentage of her base salary:

 

Line of business gross revenuenet new business

19.69

15.750

%

Line of business income before overhead allocation and taxes

17.72

13.125

%

EPS component

8.75

10.500

%

Total

46.16

39.375

%

 

For 2017,2020, Ms. Thompson received a cash incentive of $141,750.$168,022.

 

Mr. PoindexterHaving determined the total 2020 annual incentive plan payouts for each eligible NEO, the Committee then approved the annual incentive plan payout amounts as summarized below:

 

The Committee believes its incentive matrix plan for Mr. Poindexter drives achievement of the Company’s annual performance goals to support its strategic business objectives and promote the attainment of specific financial goals while encouraging teamwork, policy compliance and risk avoidance. Mr. Poindexter’s incentive is weighted 75% for his line of business and 25% for overall Company performance. Having a bank wide goal encourages referrals across department lines which ultimately return a higher EPS to the Bancorp.


  

Salary ($)

  

Target Bonus (%)

  

Target Bonus ($)

  

Actual Earned %

  

Actual Earned ($)

 

Hillebrand

 $560,000   50% $280,000   100% $280,000 

Poindexter

  396,000   40%  158,400   100%  158,400 

Thompson

  364,000   24.1%  87,725   192%  168,022 

Stinnett

  317,000   35%  110,950   100%  110,950 

Dishman

  289,000   30%  86,700   100%  86,700 

 

Line of Business Component

Mr. Poindexter’s line of business bonus consists of a matrix of all areas of his responsibility including: Commercial Banking, Private Banking, Corporate Cash Management, International, and Correspondent Banking. The Commercial Banking areas are the source of significant loan and deposit growth. Net interest income comprises approximately two-thirds of the Company’s consolidated revenues. Growth in these areas significantly impacts the profitably of the Company. Mr. Poindexter’s matrix assigns various weights to several categories including: net loan and deposit growth, related fee income, credit quality and overall management. The program requires attainment of a minimum of 50 points in aggregate for any incentive bonus to be paid. Additionally, certain point deductions are considered to promote asset quality including deductions for higher than expected loan provisioning and non-compliance with established customer service standards. Conversely, better than expected credit quality provides additional points. The matrix used to compute the incentive award, shown below, is structured such that achievement of target performance in all categories results in a cash incentive for his line of business component equal to 26.25% of base salary. Goals are considered appropriately challenging and difficult to achieve.

The loan growth component of Mr. Poindexter’s incentive plan is weighted the highest. This goal is based on growth of loans outstanding rather than gross loan production. More specifically, loan growth is measured as average loans outstanding year over year. While the Company had excellent loan production in 2017 of approximately $665 million, average loan balance growth for the year was only 5%, with most of that increase occurring in the fourth quarter and thus affecting average balances minimally.

The following is a summary of Mr. Poindexter’s performance under the short-term incentive plan.

Specific

Components

 

Component Weight at

Target Performance

  

Departmental

Points Earned

 

Loan growth

  50%  16.49 

Non-interest deposit growth

  15%  0.00 

Interest bearing deposit growth

  5%  0.00 

Loan fees

  5%  6.28 

Deposit service charge revenue

  5%  1.04 

Corporate cash management revenue

  5%  5.11 

Credit card revenue

  5%  5.84 

Credit quality

  10%  20.00 

Total

  100%  59.83 

The following summarizes the line of business component of Mr. Poindexter’s parameter of the plan.

Bonus as a Percentage of Salary

 

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  

Actual

 
50   100   200   59.83 
13.125%   26.25%   52.50%   15.71% 


EPS Component

With commercial banking being the largest contributor to earnings, the Committee believes it is important to keep Mr. Poindexter not only focused on growth but on expense control as well. Additionally, this component is extremely sensitive to asset quality as higher provisioning and chargeoffs directly impact EPS.

  

Bancorp
EPS (1)

  

EPS
Growth

  

Bonus as

Percentage of Base

Salary

 

Threshold

 $1.80   0.0%    1.75%  
  $1.82   1.1%    3.50%  
  $1.84   2.2%    5.25%  
  $1.86  ��3.3%    7.00%  

Target

 $1.88   4.5%    8.75%  
  $1.90   5.6%    10.50%  
  $1.92   6.7%    12.25%  
  $1.94   7.8%    14.00%  
  $1.96   8.9%    15.75%  

Maximum

 

$

1.98 or greater   10.0%    17.50%  

Actual Results

 $1.91   6.1%    10.50%  

(1)

Per plan parameters detailed above, the net income effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on 2017 EPS was excluded from the 2017 EPS goals. Actual EPS was $1.66 after a $0.25 charge to revalue the Company’s net deferred tax assets.

For 2017, Mr. Poindexter achieved 59.83 points under his line of business matrix plan resulting in a bonus equal to 15.71% of salary. Additionally, Mr. Poindexter received a bonus under his EPS component equal to 10.5% of salary. In aggregate, Mr. Poindexter earned a cash incentive of 26.21% of base salary, or $78,630.

Long-Term Incentives

 

The Committee believes that long-term incentive stock awards effectively align executives with interests of shareholders by providing individuals who have responsibility for management and growth of the Company with an opportunity to increase their ownership of the Company's Common Stock and to have a meaningful interest in the future of the Company.Company and sustained shareholder value creation.  In addition,making determination about the mix of vehicles in the long-term incentive equity awards allow Bancorpgrants, the Compensation Committee allocates a higher than median portion to effectively compete for executive talent both with other publicly traded banks, that regularly offerperformance-based equity, as part of the executive compensation program, and non-public banks whose lack of equity awards can put them at a competitive disadvantage.lower portion to time-based equity.

 

Committee’s2020 Equity Award Philosophy

The Company’s 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan is aligned with shareholders’ interests in the following ways:

Includes a double-trigger for accelerated vesting upon a change in control;

Includes a clawback policy;

Requires a minimum vesting period of one year;

Excludes liberal share recycling; and

Prohibits repricing of SARs or options or buy-out of underwater awards without shareholder approval.


In addition, our grant practices demonstrate a commitment to performance-based compensation tied to long-term shareholder value.

The Committee will generally require a minimum post-vesting holding period of one year in certain grant agreements for executive officers (net of a portion which may be sold to pay income taxes);

Executives receive stock appreciation rights which gain value only through stock price appreciation;

Vesting of annual performance unit grants to executives is based on three-year measurements of earnings per share growth and return on assets relative to peers, both of which should contribute to increases in shareholder value;

Stock appreciation rights vest over five years; and

No dividends are accrued or paid on performance unit grants until grants are earned.

2017Equity Awards

 

In 2017,2020, the Committee continued its historical practice of having performance-based awardsPSUs at target constitute 75% of the grant date value of the total long-term award and stock appreciation rightsSARs represent 25% of the total long-term award. The Committee favors continuing the use of SARs because they directly align the interests of executives with shareholders’ interests as value is only realized through a rising stock price.

 

The value of the long-term incentive award was determined as a percentage of the participant’s 2017participant’s 2020 base salary and wasis subsequently expressed as a number of shares of Company Common Stock valued on the date of grant. Fractional shares are not distributable. The following table below summarizes the equity awards made to NEOs under the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.

 

2017 Grant Summary

             
                 
  

PSUs at Target (1)

  

SARs (2)

 
  

Number
Granted

  

Fair Value

  

Number
Granted

  

Fair Value

 

Heintzman

  7,080  $252,473   13,273  $84,151 

Davis

  2,120  $75,599   3,975  $25,202 

Hillebrand

  4,039  $144,031   7,571  $48,000 

Thompson

  3,180  $113,399   5,962  $37,799 

Poindexter

  2,650  $94,499   4,968  $31,497 

2020 Grant Summary

      

PSUs at Target (1)

  

SARs (2)

 
  

% of Base

Salary

  

Number
Granted

  

Fair Value

  

Number
Granted

  

Fair Value

 

Hillebrand

  60

%

  7,809  $251,996   14,482  $83,996 

Poindexter

  48

%

  4,417   142,537   8,193   47,519 

Stinnett

  42

%

  3,094   99,843   5,738   33,280 

Thompson

  42

%

  3,553   114,655   6,589   38,216 

Dishman

  36

%

  2,418   78,029   4,484   26,007 

 

(1)

Because grantees are not entitled to dividend payments during the performance period and have a mandatory one-year post vestingpost-vesting holding period, the fair value of these PSUs is estimated based upon the fair value of the underlying shares on the date of the grant, which was $40.00, adjusted for non-payment of dividends and illiquidity discounts. The resulting fair value was $35.66 per share.grant.

(2)

SARs are valued using Black-Scholes option pricing model.model as of the date of grant.

 


36

 

Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”)

 

In 2017,2020, the Committee granted PSUs to each of the NEOsNEOs. The terms of the 2020 PSUs were not revised based on changes to economic outlook due to the COVID-19 pandemic. PSUs were awarded under the following terms:

 

Performance period:  

Three years, beginning January 1, 20172020 through December 31, 2019.2022.

Performance goals at

50% weighting each:

1. Cumulative EPS over the three-year performance period, excluding one-time acquisition costs and the effect, ifeffects of any onchanges in income tax law legislation changesrates that become effective during the performance period.

2. ROAA over the three-year performance period compared to all publicpublicly-traded banks $1.5-$6.0with total assets between $1.5 and $7.0 billion in assets as calculated by S&P Global Market Intelligence. Performance will be measured by calculating the simple average of the Company’s ROAAsROAA for the three years in the performance period and determining the percentile ranking as compared to peers.

Performance ranges:

The PSUs provide for minimum,threshold, target and maximum performance goals as follows:

MinimumTargetMaximum
Three year cumulative EPS                                                      See Below
Peer bank ROAA performance percentile             >50%         75%                90%

 

 

Threshold

 

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three-year cumulative EPS

 

 

 

 

See Below

 

 

 

 

Peer bank ROAA performance percentile

 

80%

 

 

85%

 

 

90%

 

 

Three-year EPS performance goals have been established by the Compensation Committee and consider Bancorp’sthe Company’s strategic plan as well as projected growth targets in order to maintain our standard as a top-performing community bank. The three-year EPS goal has defined Minimum, Targetthreshold, target and Maximummaximum performance levels. We have elected not to disclose these performance levels for competitive reasons.     reasons, but we note that the levels for 2020 PSUs were set higher than those for the grants of PSUs made in 2019.

 

The table below summarizes the design of the PSU portion of the 20172020 long-term incentive plan (all percentages relate to each executive’s 20172020 base salary)salary in effect at January 1, 2020):

 

 

EPS

  

Bancorp ROAA vs. Peers

  

Total Value of PSUs that may be

Earned, Based on Grant-Date Value,

as a % of Base Salary

 

 

EPS

 

ROAA vs. Peers

 

Total Value of PSUs that may be

Earned, Based on Grant-Date

Value, as a % of Base Salary

 

Minimum

  

Target

  

Maximum

  

Minimum

  

Target

  

Maximum

  

Minimum

  

Target

  

Maximum

 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

Heintzman

  9.0%  22.5%  56.25%  9.0%  22.5%  56.25%  18.0%  45.0%  112.50%

Davis

  5.4%  13.5%  33.75%  5.4%  13.5%  33.75%  10.8%  27.0%  67.50%

Hillebrand

  7.2%  18.0%  45.00%  7.2%  18.0%  45.00%  14.4%  36.0%  90.00%

 

9.0

%

 

22.5

%

 

56.25

%

 

9.0

%

 

22.5

%

 

56.3

%

 

18.0

%

 

45.0

%

 

112.5

%

Thompson

  6.3%  15.75%  39.375%  6.3%  15.75%  39.375%  12.6%  31.5%  78.75%

Poindexter

  6.3%  15.75%  39.375%  6.3%  15.75%  39.375%  12.6%  31.5%  78.75%

 

7.2

%

 

18.0

%

 

45.0

%

 

7.2

%

 

18.0

%

 

45.0

%

 

14.4

%

 

36.0

%

 

90.0

%

Stinnett

 

6.3

%

 

15.75

%

 

39.375

%

 

6.3

%

 

15.75

%

 

39.375

%

 

12.6

%

 

31.5

%

 

78.75

%

Thompson

 

6.3

%

 

15.75

%

 

39.375

%

 

6.3

%

 

15.75

%

 

39.375

%

 

12.6

%

 

31.5

%

 

78.75

%

Dishman

 

5.4

%

 

13.5

%

 

33.75

%

 

5.4

%

 

13.5

%

 

33.75

%

 

10.8

%

 

27.0

%

 

67.50

%

 

SharesPSUs certified as earned by the Compensation Committee at the end of the performance period will be distributed to PSU participants by March 31st of the year following the performance period. All payouts of PSUs will be made in shares of BancorpCompany Common Stock based on the percentage earned of the maximumtarget number of shares per participant determined at the beginning of the performance period.

 

PSUs generally require the executive to remain employed or serve on the Board of Directors until the end of a performance cycle in order to vest and be paid in shares of Common Stock, with prorated awards still paid to those who leave Bancorpthe Company mid-cycle due to death, disability or retirement (age 60).  PSUs also vest at the target level (50% of the maximum) if a change in control occurs before a performance cycle ends. Executives do not receive the benefit of any dividends or other distributions paid on stock related to PSUs until after the stock is actually issued. In addition, executives are required to observe a one-year holding period after vesting, net of any shares sold to pay income taxes.

37

No pandemic-related changes were implemented to our long-term incentive awards granted in 2020 or prior years.

 

PSUs granted in 20152018 vested as of December 31, 20172020 and will be certified and distributed by March 31, 2018.2021. Based on our aggregate EPS for the three-year performance period 2018-2020 and preliminary data indicating that our average ROAA for the three-year performance period of 1.68% significantly exceeded the 90th percentile of the comparator group, we expect that recipients will be awarded grants on the EPS portion at “Minimum”target and the ROAA portion at “Maximum”.the maximum performance levels.

 


 

Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”)

 

SARs provide an executivea NEO with the right to receive Stock Yards BancorpCompany Common Stock equal in value to the appreciation in BancorpCompany stock, if any, over the stock price as of the grant date as compared with the stock price during the exercise period. The vesting period of the SARs granted to executives in 20172020 is five years and the exercise period is ten years.

 

V.

Additional Compensation Policies and Practices

 

Other Executive Benefits

 

Post-Employment Compensation and BenefitsBenefits. To enhance the objective of retaining key executives, the Company established Change in Control Severance (“CICS”) Agreements, concluding it to be in the best interests of Bancorp,the Company and its shareholders and the Bancorp to take reasonable steps to compensate key executives, including all NEOs, in the event of a change in control or similar event. With these agreements in place, if Bancorpthe Company should receive takeover or acquisition proposals from third parties, Bancorpthe Company will be able to call upon these key executives for their advice and assessment of whether such proposals are in the best interests of shareholders, free of the influences of their personal employment situations. The CICS Agreements were updated in 2013 to require a both a significant change in Bancorp’sthe Company’s ownership and termination of employment before executives would receive any payment under the agreements. This approach is commonly referred to as a double-trigger.

 

Supplemental Retirement BenefitsBenefits. The Bank has a nonqualified deferred compensation plan which, until 2006, merely provided all executive officers, including all NEOs, with the ability to defer a portion of their cash compensation and related taxes, and instead receive such compensation after their employment with the Bank ends or, in certain cases, while still employed by the Bank through in-service distributions. Amendments in 2006 provided executives with Bank contributions for the amount of match they do not receive under the KSOP because of certain limits under the Internal Revenue Code.

 

In the 1980's, the Bank created a plan (called the Senior Officer Security Plan (“SOSP”)) to enhance the retirement security of certain NEOs by granting them a fixed annual benefit per year after retirement. This fixed amount was originally designed to supplement broader-based retirement programs and bring the executives' retirement income from combined sources of the tax-qualified employer retirement programs, social security and this plan to a level of approximately 70% of their pre-retirement income. Once implemented, the benefit amounts were never adjusted and therefore the plan is not expected to yield the level of income replacement contemplated. This plan still covers twoone current executive officers, Mr. Heintzman andofficer, Ms. Thompson, and there are no intentions to adjust their paymentsher payment or add additional participants.

 

38

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

The Committee believes that theour executive officers of Bancorp should maintain meaningful equity interests in Bancorpthe Company to ensure that their interests are aligned with those of our shareholders. We adopted stock ownership guidelines that require our executive officers to own directly or indirectly a minimum level of Bancorpthe Company’s Common Stock, depending upon the executive’s position. Shares held by the executive, the executive’s spouse, or minor children, including, without limitation, shares held for the account of the executive in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, the BancorpCompany’s KSOP plan or an IRA or unvested time-based stock grants are deemed owned by the executive under the guidelines. The CEO isNew or newly promoted officers to an executive level are required to maintain ownershipreach the guidelines within five years of Common Stock worth three (3) times his base salary. Each of the otherattaining executive officers is required to maintain ownership of Common Stock worth two (2) times his or her base salary.status. The valuation is based on the closing price on the last trading day of the preceding calendar year. The Committee regularly reviews these guidelines in light of changing market trends, governance best practices and policies of our peer banks. In November 2020 this review led us to increase the multiple for our CEO from 5x to 6x in order to remain in a leadership position with respect to our ownership guidelines.

 


Position

Multiple of Base Salary

Chief Executive Officer

6x

President

4x

All Other Named Executive Officers

3x

 

All officers in the summary compensation table exceeded theNEOs currently exceed his or her applicable guidelines as evidenced below.

 

Base salary

Multiplier

Goal

Actual at December 31, 2017

Mr. Heintzman

$561,000

3

$1,683,000

$7,039,000

Ms. Davis

$280,000

2

$ 560,000

$3,904,000

Mr. Hillebrand

$400,000

2

$ 800,000

$3,321,000

Ms. Thompson

$360,000

2

$ 720,000

$2,609,000

Mr. Poindexter

$300,000

2

$ 600,000

$1,328,000

stock ownership guidelines.

 

Clawbacks

 

The Committee maintains a general clawback policy to give Bancorpthe Company the flexibility to require the return of paid compensation in certain circumstances, and amended its two primary performance-based compensation vehicles—the cash incentive plan under which NEO annual bonuses are awarded, and the PSU award agreements described above, to add the clawback provision.circumstances.

 

The policy allows the Company to recover some or all of the amounts paid with respect to awards that were based on achievement of performance criteria, at any time in the three calendar years following payment, if and to the extent that the Committee concludes that (i) federal or state law or the listing requirements of the exchange on which the Company’s stock is listed for trading so require, (ii) the performance criteria required for the award were not met, or not met to the extent necessary to support the amount of the award that was paid, or (iii) as required by Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, after a restatement of the Company’s financial results as reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

HedgingAnti-Hedging and Pledging of Company StockAnti-Pledging Policy

 

Under our insider trading policy, no employeedirector, officer (including our NEOs) or directoremployee is permitted to engage in securities transactions that would allow them either to insulate themselves from, or profit from, a decline in the CompanyCompany’s stock price. Similarly, no employeedirector, officer (including our NEOs) or directoremployee may enter into hedging transactions in the Company’sCompany stock. Such transactions include (without limitation) short sales as well as any hedging transactions in derivative securities (e.g. puts, calls, swaps or collars) or other speculative transactions related to the Company’s stock. Pledging ofHolding Company stock in a margin account or pledging Company stock is also generally prohibited.

 

Income Tax Considerations

 

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid by a public company to its CEO or any of its other three most highly paid executive officers (other than the CFO). For 2017 and prior years, this limitation did not apply to compensation that qualified as “performance-based”, as defined by the tax code to mean compensation that was based on the achievement of pre-established objective performance goals and paid under a plan pre-approved by our shareholders. For 2017 and prior years, the Committee monitored the effect of Section 162(m) on the deductibility of the Company’s compensation. The Committee weighed the benefits of full deductibility with the other objectives of the executive compensation program and, accordingly, could have from time to time paid compensation that was not tax-deductible. For 2017 and prior years, no compensation paid to executives was limited as to deductibility under Section 162(m).

 

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the qualified performance-based compensation exception to Section 162(m) that generally provided for the continued deductibility of performance-based compensation was repealed, effective for tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2018. Accordingly, commencing with our fiscal year endingended December 31, 2018, compensation to our NEOs in excess of $1,000,000 not awarded prior to November 2, 2017, will generally not be deductible. Performance-based compensation awarded to our Named Executive OfficersNEOs for periods prior to November 2, 2017, such as our performance-based RSUsPSUs granted in 2017 and prior years that have not yet been settled into shares of Common Stock, are expected to continue to qualify for the performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m). The United States Treasury has not yet issued any guidance on any limitations on the continued deductibility of these awards. Accordingly, the future deductibility of these grandfathered awards cannot be guaranteed.

 


39

 

The Committee will continue to evaluate the impact of the elimination of the performance-based exemption on its compensation programs. The Committee may award compensation in the future that is not fully deductible under Section 162(m) if the Committee believes that such compensation will help the Company achieve its business objectives and serve the best interests of its shareholders.

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

 

The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and based on such review and discussions the Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Proxy Statement.

 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

Richard A. Lechleiter, Chairman

Charles R. Edinger III

Richard A. Lechleiter, Chairman

Stephen M. Priebe

John L. Schutte

Norman Tasman

 

The report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed soliciting material or subject to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

 


 

Executive Compensation Tables and Narrative Disclosure

 

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Throughout this section, we refer to executives named in this table individually as the "executive" and collectively as the "executives". Each executive holds those same offices at the Bank, as well.

 

Summary Compensation Table

Name and

 

Salary

Bonus

Stock
Awards

Option
Awards

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

Change in Pension

Value and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

All Other

Compensation

Total

Principal Position

Year

($)

($)

($) (1)

($) (2)

($) (3)

($) (4)

($) (5) (6)

($)

          

David P. Heintzman

2017

561,000

-

252,473

84,151

336,600

125,915

98,947

1,459,086

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

2016

550,000

-

177,511

88,119

440,000

73,789

97,146

1,426,565

 

2015

545,000

-

174,318

86,245

272,500

-

98,245

1,176,308

          

Nancy B. Davis

2017

280,000

-

75,599

25,202

100,800

-

48,054

529,655

Chief Financial Officer

2016

270,000

-

52,297

25,957

129,600

-

46,821

524,675

 

2015

249,000

-

47,784

23,639

74,700

-

43,471

438,594

          

James A. Hillebrand

2017

400,000

-

144,031

48,000

192,000

-

66,649

850,680

President

2016

400,000

-

103,271

51,267

256,000

-

68,380

878,918

 

2015

386,000

-

98,775

48,867

154,400

-

71,481

759,523

          

Kathy C. Thompson

2017

360,000

-

113,399

37,799

141,750

76,852

63,575

793,375

Senior EVP and Manager

2016

360,000

-

81,328

40,373

173,268

67,048

63,547

785,564

of Wealth Management and Trust

2015

354,000

-

79,255

39,211

30,975

6,471

63,342

573,254

          

Phillip S. Poindexter

2017

300,000

-

94,499

31,497

78,630

-

51,276

555,902

EVP and Chief Lending Officer

2016

300,000

-

67,762

33,646

165,180

-

51,558

618,146

 

2015

290,000

-

64,937

32,124

94,656

-

49,799

531,516

Compensation is presented for all years in which the executives were also named executive officers.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and

 

Salary

Bonus

Stock
Awards

Option
Awards

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

Change in Pension

Value and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

All Other

Compensation

Total

Principal Position

Year

($)

($)

($) (1)

($) (2)

($) (3)

($) (4)

($) (5) (6)

($)

          

James A. Hillebrand

2020

560,000

-

251,996

83,996

280,000

-

92,326

1,268,318

Chairman and Chief Executive

2019

540,000

-

242,980

80,999

540,000

-

89,155

1,493,134

Officer

2018

444,000

-

148,333

187,437

229,320

-

73,258

1,082,348

          

Philip S. Poindexter

2020

396,000

-

142,537

47,519

158,400

-

66,544

811,000

President

2019

385,000

-

138,594

46,197

308,000

-

65,111

942,902

 

2018

328,000

-

97,332

129,048

152,133

-

49,661

756,174

          

T. Clay Stinnett

2020

317,000

-

99,843

33,280

110,950

-

53,682

614,755

Chief Financial Officer

2019

301,000

-

81,260

89,933

180,600

-

50,816

703,609

          

Kathy C. Thompson

2020

364,000

-

114,655

38,216

168,022

100,368

63,914

849,175

Senior EVP and Manager of

2019

364,000

-

114,635

38,219

159,250

127,233

63,809

867,146

Wealth Management and Trust

2018

364,000

-

114,679

38,222

133,770

-

65,352

716,023

          

William M. Dishman III

2020

289,000

-

78,029

26,007

86,700

-

49,817

529,553

EVP and Chief Risk Officer

2019

286,000

-

77,192

25,739

171,600

-

49,540

610,071

 

2018

275,000

-

74,245

24,749

111,705

-

47,650

533,349

          

 

(1)

Stock awards include PSUs entitling executives to the issuance of one share of Common Stock for each vested PSU after the expiration of a three-year performance period. The value of the PSU grants measured at the grant date value was $35.66$32.27 in 2017, $22.612020, $32.03 in 20162019 and $20.02$31.54 in 2015.2018. The amount of related compensation included in the table above is that associated with the most probable performance outcome at the time of the grant. The table below reflects first the amount of compensation included in the Summary Compensation Table and second, the maximum amount achievable under these grants (in dollars).grants.

 

 

2017

  

2016

  

2015

  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 
 

Most Probable

on

Date of Grant

  

Maximum

  

Most Probable

on

Date of Grant

  

Maximum

  

Most Probable

on

Date of Grant

  

Maximum

  

Most

Probable on

Date of Grant

  

Maximum

  

Most

Probable on

Date of Grant

  

Maximum

  

Most

Probable on

Date of Grant

  

Maximum

 
                        

Heintzman

  252,473   631,218   177,511   443,778   174,318   435,795 

Davis

  75,599   189,034   52,297   130,708   47,784   119,460 

Hillebrand

  144,031   360,059   103,271   258,229   98,775   246,938  $251,996  $629,975  $242,980  $607,481  $148,333  $370,816 

Poindexter

  142,537   356,390   138,594   346,469   97,332   243,363 

Stinnett

  99,843   249,608   81,260   203,166   N/A   N/A 

Thompson

  113,399   283,533   81,328   203,320   79,255   198,138   114,655   286,622   114,635   286,636   114,679   286,667 

Poindexter

  94,499   236,283   67,762   169,439   64,937   162,343 

Dishman

  78,029   195,072   77,192   193,045   74,245   185,644 

 

(2)

Stock appreciation rightsCustomary SARs were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on the applicable grant date, or $40.00, $25.76$ 37.30, $36.65 and $22.95$35.90 in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The fair value of each SAR was $6.34, $3.55$5.80, $6.61 and $3.97,$6.66 respectively. SARs granted to Mr. Stinnett in conjunction with his May 1, 2019 promotion were granted with an exercise price of 10% higher than the closing price of the Common Stock on the grant date or $34.71, and the fair value of each of these SARs was $5.03. For assumptions used in valuation of stock appreciation rightsSARs and other information regarding stock-based compensation, refer to Note 17 to the 20172020 consolidated financial statements.statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

 


41

 

(3)

In the earlier section of this proxy statement captioned “CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis, we refer to Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation as “short-termshort-term cash incentives”incentives or “cashcash incentives.

 

(4)(4)

Assumptions used in calculating the change in actuarial value of the defined benefit above include a discount rate of 3.59%2.43% for December 31, 2017, 4.10%2020, 3.16% for December 31, 20162019 and 4.28%4.20% for December 31, 2015,2018, retirement age of 65, and payments occurring for 15 years, with no pre- or post-retirement mortality.

Earnings on the executives' nonqualified deferred compensation balances are not included above. The investment alternatives of the nonqualified plan do not and have not offered above-market rates of interest or preferential returns.

(5)

Earnings on the executives' nonqualified deferred compensation balances are not included above. The investment alternatives of the nonqualified plan do not and have not offered above-market rates of interest or preferential returns.
(5)

All Other Compensation in 20172020 consists of the following (in dollars):   following:

   

 

Heintzman

  

Davis

  

Hillebrand

  

Thompson

  

Poindexter

  

Hillebrand

  

Poindexter

  

Stinnett

  

Thompson

  

Dishman

 

Matching contribution to 401(k)

  16,200   16,200   16,200   16,200   16,200  $17,100  $17,100  $17,100  $17,100  $17,100 

Contribution to ESOP

  5,400   5,400   5,400   5,400   5,400   5,700   5,700   5,700   5,700   5,700 

Contribution to nonqualified plan (a)

  68,160   23,200   42,400   36,000   26,400 

Contribution to nonqualified plan *

  66,800   40,560   27,920   35,440   23,440 

Other

  9,187   3,254   2,649   5,975   3,276   2,726   3,184   2,962   5,674   3,577 
  98,947   48,054   66,649   63,547   51,276 

 

(a)* This is a Bank contribution to supplement the contributions that the executive does not receive under the Bank’s Bank’s tax-qualified KSOP because of plan limits or Internal Revenue Code limits.

 

(6)(6)

Perquisites totaled less than $10,000 for each executive and are therefore not included in the table.


 

The following table sets forth information concerning plan-based awards made to the executives during the last fiscal year.

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

 

  

Payouts

under non-equity

incentive plan awards (1)

  

Estimated future payouts

under equity

incentive plan awards (2)

   

All other

stock

   

All other
option

   

 

 

   

Grant

 
              awards awards: Exercise date fair 
                            number of   number of   or base   value of 
                           shares of   securities   price of   stock and 
              stock or underlying option option   

Payouts

under non-equity

incentive plan awards (1)

  

Estimated future payouts

under equity

incentive plan awards (2)

  

All other

stock awards:

number of

shares of

stock or

  

All other
option awards:

number of

securities

underlying

  

Exercise

or base

price of

option

  

Grant
date fair

value of

stock and

option

 

Grant

 

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

   

 units

    options    awards   awards  

Grant

 

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  units  options  awards  awards 

Name

date

  ($)   ($)   ($)  

(#)

  

(#)

  

(#)

    (#)    (#)(3)    ($/Sh)    ($) 

date

 

($)

  

($)

  

($)

  

(#)

  

(#)

  

(#)

  (#)  (#)(3)  ($/Sh)  ($) 

Heintzman

3/21/17

  56,100   280,500   561,000   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Hillebrand

2/25/20

  28,000   140,000   280,000   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

3/21/17

  -   -   -   2,832   7,080   17,701   -   -   -   252,473 

2/25/20

  -   -   -   3,123   7,809   19,522   -   -   -   251,996 

3/21/17

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   13,273   40.00   84,151 

2/25/20

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   14,482   37.30   83,996 

Davis

3/21/17

  16,800   84,000   168,000   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Poindexter

2/25/20

  15,840   79,200   158,400   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

3/21/17

  -   -   -   848   2,120   5,301   -   -   -   75,599 

2/25/20

  -   -   -   1,767   4,417   11,044   -   -   -   142,537 

3/21/17

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   3,975   40.00   25,202 

2/25/20

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   8,193   37.30   47,519 

Hillebrand

3/21/17

  32,000   160,000   320,000   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Stinnett

2/25/20

  11,095   55,475   110,950   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

3/21/17

  -   -   -   1,615   4,039   10,097   -   -   -   144,031 

2/25/20

  -   -   -   1,237   3,094   7,735   -   -   -   99,843 

3/21/17

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   7,571   40.00   48,000 

2/25/20

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   5,738   37.30   33,280 

Thompson

3/21/17

  25,200   126,000   252,000   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

2/25/20

  22,313   111,493   222,950   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

3/21/17

  -   -   -   1,272   3,180   7,951   -   -   -   113,399 

2/25/20

  -   -   -   1,421   3,553   8,882   -   -   -   114,655 

3/21/17

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   5,962   40.00   37,799 

2/25/20

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   6,589   37.30   38,216 

Poindexter

3/21/17

  21,000   105,000   210,000   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Dishman

2/25/20

  8,670   43,350   86,700   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

3/21/17

  -   -   -   1,060   2,650   6,626   -   -   -   94,499 

2/25/20

  -   -   -   967   2,418   6,045   -   -   -   78,029 

3/21/17

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   4,968   40.00   31,497 

2/25/20

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   4,484   37.30   26,007 

All material terms and conditions of grants are described in Compensationthe section of this Proxy Statement captioned “Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Analysis”. All equity grants were made under our 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan andPlan. Grants consisted of:

 

(1)

Cash incentives

(2)

Performance stock unitsPSUs

(3)

Stock appreciation rightsSARs

 


 

The following table sets forth information concerning equity stock options, SARs restricted stock and PSUs held by the executives as of the end of the last fiscal year.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table

 
                              
  

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 
  

 

 

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

options

(#)

  

 

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

options

(#) (1)

  

Option

exercise

price

 

Option

expiration

 

 

Number of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested

  

Market

value of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested

  

 

Equity

incentive plan

awards:

number of

unearned

shares, units

or other

rights that

have not

vested

  

Equity

incentive plan

awards:

market or

payout value

of unearned

shares, units

or other

rights that

have not

vested

 
Name 

Exercisable

  

Unexercisable

  ($) date  (#) (2)   ($)   (#) (3)    ($) 

Heintzman

                             
   26,325   -   14.02 

2/16/2020

  -   -   -   - 
   21,573   -   15.84 

3/15/2021

  -   -   -   - 
   36,411   -   15.24 

2/20/2022

  -   -   -   - 
   20,012   5,003   15.26 

2/19/2023

  862   32,497   -   - 
   17,393   11,596   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   - 
   8,696   13,046   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   - 
   4,959   19,840   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   19,627   739,938 
   -   13,273   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   12,390   467,103 
   135,369   62,758        862   32,497   32,017   1,207,041 

Davis

                             
   5,226   -   15.84 

3/15/2021

  -   -   -   - 
   9,187   -   15.24 

2/20/2022

  -   -   -   - 
   -   -   15.26 

2/19/2023

  449   16,927   -   - 
   4,633   3,090   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   - 
   2,383   3,576   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   - 
   1,461   5,844   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   5,871   221,337 
   -   3,975   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   3,710   139,867 
   22,890   16,485        449   16,927   9,581   361,204 

Hillebrand

                             
   13,500   -   14.02 

2/16/2020

  -   -   -   - 
   10,968   -   15.84 

3/15/2021

  -   -   -   - 
   19,600   -   15.24 

2/20/2022

  -   -   -   - 
   22,443   5,611   15.26 

2/19/2023

  -   -   -   - 
   9,855   6,570   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   - 
   4,927   7,392   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   - 
   2,885   11,543   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   11,419   430,496 
   -   7,571   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   7,068   266,464 
   84,178   38,687        -   -   18,487   696,960 

Thompson

                             
   -   -   - 

2/19/2023

  778   29,331   -   - 
   7,908   5,272   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   - 
   3,954   5,931   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   - 
   2,272   9,090   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   8,992   338,998 
   -   5,962   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   5,565   209,801 
   14,134   26,255        778   29,331   14,557   548,799 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table

  

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#)

Exercisable

  

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#) (1)

Unexercisable

  

Option exercise price

($)

 

Option expiration date

 

Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested

(#)

  

Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested

($)

  

Equity incentive plan awards: number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested

(#) (2)

  

Equity incentive plan awards:

market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested

($)

 

Hillebrand

                             
   19,600   -   15.24 

2/20/2022

  -   -   -   - 
   28,054   -   15.26 

2/19/2023

  -   -   -   - 
   16,425   -   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   - 
   12,319   -   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   - 
   11,542   2,886   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   -   - 
   4,542   3,029   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   -   - 
   2,969   4,454   35.90 

2/20/2028

  -   -   -   - 
   10,000   15,000   39.32 

10/1/2028

  -   -   -   - 
   2,450   9,804   36.65 

2/19/2029

  -   -   11,000   445,280 
   -   14,482   37.30 

2/25/2030

  -   -   13,666   553,200 
   107,901   49,655        -   -   24,666   998,480 

Poindexter

                             
   7,575   -   15.26 

2/19/2023

  -   -   -   - 
   8,872   -   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   - 
   8,098   -   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   - 
   7,575   1,894   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   -   - 
   2,980   1,988   40.00 

3/21/2027

 

‐-

   -   -   - 
   1,948   2,924   35.90 

2/20/2028

  -   -   -   - 
   7,000   10,500   39.32 

10/1/2028

  -   -   -   - 
   1,397   5,592   36.65 

2/19/2029

  -   -   6,274   253,972 
   -   8,193   37.30 

2/25/2030

  -   -   7,731   312,951 
   45,445   31,091        -   -   14,005   566,923 

Stinnett

                             
   11,502   -   15.26 

2/19/2023

  -   -   -   - 
   6,861   -   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   - 
   5,481   -   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   - 
   5,496   1,375   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   -   - 
   2,163   1,443   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   -   - 
   1,416   2,125   35.90 

2/20/2028

  -   -   -   - 
   819   3,279   36.65 

2/19/2029

  -   -   3,679   148,926 
   2,500   10,000   38.18 

5/1/2029

  -   -   -   - 
   -   5,738   37.30 

2/25/2030

  -   -   5,414   219,159 
   36,238   23,960                9,093   368,085 

44

  

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#)

Exercisable

  

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#) (1)

Unexercisable

  

Option exercise price

($)

 

Option expiration date

 

Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested

(#)

  

Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested

($)

  

Equity incentive plan awards: number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested

(#) (2)

  

Equity incentive plan awards:

market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested

($)

 

Thompson

                             
   1,977   -   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   - 
   -   2,273   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   -   - 
   3,577   2,385   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   -   - 
   2,295   3,444   35.90 

2/20/2028

  -   -   -   - 
   1,156   4,626   36.65 

2/19/2029

  -   -   5,190   210,091 
   -   6,589   37.30 

2/25/2030

  -   -   6,218   251,705 
   9,005   19,317        -   -   11,408   461,796 

Dishman

                             
   5,005   -   15.24 

2/20/2022

  -   -   -   - 
   8,298   -   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   - 
   6,343   -   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   - 
   5,736   1,434   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   -   - 
   2,299   1,534   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   -   - 
   1,486   2,230   35.90 

2/20/2028

  -   -   -   - 
   778   3,116   36.65 

2/19/2029

  -   -   3,496   141,518 
   -   4,484   37.30 

2/25/2030

  -   -   4,232   171,311 
   29,945   12,798        -   -   7,728   312,829 

 


 

  

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 
Name 

 

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

options

(#)

Exercisable

  

 

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

options

(#) (1)

Unexercisable

  

Option

exercise

price

($)

  

Option

expiration

date

 

Number of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested

(#) (2)  

  

Market

value of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested

($)

  

Equity

incentive plan

awards:

number of

unearned

shares, units

or other

rights that

have not

vested

(#) (3)

  

Equity

incentive plan

awards:

market or

payout value

of unearned

shares, units

or other

rights that

have not

vested

($)

 

Poindexter

                             
   6,145   -   15.84 

3/15/2021

  -   -   -   - 
   10,698   -   15.24 

2/20/2022

  -   -   -   - 
   6,060   1,515   15.26 

2/19/2023

  261   9,840   -   - 
   5,323   3,549   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   - 
   3,239   4,859   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   - 
   1,893   7,576   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   7,494   282,524 
   -   4,968   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   4,638   174,853 
   33,358   22,467        261   9,840   12,132   457,377 

(1)

Stock appreciation rightsSARs vest 20% each year beginning one year after the grant date and each anniversary thereafter. The vesting schedule for SARs for each named executive officer is as follows (in number of shares):.

 

Vesting Date

 

Heintzman

  

Davis

  

Hillebrand

  

Thompson

  

Poindexter

 
                     

2/18/2018

  5,798   1,545   3,285   2,636   1,774 

2/19/2018

  5,003   -   5,611   -   1,515 

3/15/2018

  4,960   1,461   2,886   2,273   1,894 

3/17/2018

  4,349   1,192   2,464   1,977   1,619 

3/21/2018

  2,654   795   1,514   1,192   993 

2/18/2019

  5,798   1,545   3,285   2,636   1,775 

3/15/2019

  4,960   1,461   2,886   2,273   1,894 

3/17/2019

  4,348   1,192   2,464   1,977   1,620 

3/21/2019

  2,655   795   1,514   1,192   994 

3/15/2020

  4,960   1,461   2,886   2,272   1,894 

3/17/2020

  4,349   1,192   2,464   1,977   1,620 

3/21/2020

  2,654   795   1,514   1,192   993 

3/15/2021

  4,960   1,461   2,886   2,273   1,894 

3/21/2021

  2,655   795   1,514   1,192   994 

3/21/2022

  2,655   795   1,514   1,193   994 
                     
   62,758   16,485   38,687   26,255   22,467 


Vesting Date

 

Hillebrand

  

Poindexter

  

Stinnett

  

Thompson

  

Dishman

 

2/19/2021

  2,451   1,398   820   1,156   779 

2/20/2021

  1,484   975   708   1,148   743 

2/25/2021

  2,896   1,638   1,147   1,317   896 

3/15/2021

  2,886   1,894   1,375   2,273   1,434 

3/21/2021

  1,514   994   721   1,192   767 

5/1/2021

  -   -   2,500   -   - 

10/1/2021

  5,000   3,500   -   -   - 

3/21/2022

  1,515   994   722   1,193   767 

2/19/2022

  2,451   1,398   819   1,157   779 

2/20/2022

  1,485   974   708   1,148   743 

2/25/2022

  2,896   1,639   1,148   1,318   897 

5/1/2022

  -   -   2,500   -   - 

10/1/2022

  5,000   3,500   -   -   - 

2/19/2023

  2,451   1,398   820   1,156   779 

2/20/2023

  1,485   975   709   1,148   744 

2/25/2023

  2,897   1,638   1,147   1,318   897 

5/1/2023

  -   -   2,500   -   - 

10/1/2023

  5,000   3,500   -   -   - 

2/19/2024

  2,451   1,398   820   1,157   779 

2/25/2024

  2,896   1,639   1,148   1,318   897 

5/1/2024

  -   -   2,500   -   - 

2/25/2025

  2,897   1,639   1,148   1,318   897 
   49,655   31,091   23,960   19,317   12,798 

 

(2)

Shares vest ratably over five years beginning one year from the date of grant and each anniversary thereafter. The vesting schedule for restricted stock awards for each named executive officer is as follows (in number of shares):

Vesting Date

 

Heintzman

  

Davis

  

Hillebrand

  

Thompson

  

Poindexter

 
                     

2/19/2018

  862   449   -   778   261 
                     
   862   449   -   778   261 

(3)

Performance stock unitsPSUs are earned over three year performance periods ending December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 based on EPS and ROAA goals. The vesting schedule for PSUs for each named executive officer is as follows (in number of shares) and represents management’smanagements estimate of most likely performance outcomes as of December 31, 2017.2020. For PSUs vesting on December 31, 2018,2021, most likely represents achievement of both EPS goals at threshold and ROAA goals at maximum. For PSUs vesting on December 31, 2019,2022, most likely represents achievement of EPS goals at target and ROAA goals at maximum.

 

Vesting Date

 

Heintzman

  

Davis

  

Hillebrand

  

Thompson

  

Poindexter

 
                     

12/31/2018

  19,627   5,871   11,419   8,992   7,494 

12/31/2019

  12,390   3,710   7,068   5,565   4,638 
                     
   32,017   9,581   18,487   14,557   12,132 

Vesting Date

 

Hillebrand

  

Poindexter

  

Stinnett

  

Thompson

  

Dishman

 

12/31/2021

  11,000   6,274   3,679   5,190   3,496 

12/31/2022

  13,666   7,731   5,414   6,218   4,232 
   24,666   14,005   9,093   11,408   7,728 

 


 

The following table sets forth stock optionsSARs exercised by or stock awards vested for the executives during the last fiscal year. Stock Awardsawards include PSUs that vested on December 31, 2017.2020. Final determination as to the amounts of these awards will be calculated in March 2018.2021. Therefore, the awards in this table are the most probable amount.amount as of December 31, 2020.

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

             
                 
  

Option Awards

  

Stock Awards

 
  

Number of Shares

  

Value Realized

  

Number of Shares

  

Value Realized

 
  

Acquired on Exercise

  

on Exercise

  

Acquired on Vesting

  

on Vesting

 

Name

 

(#)

  ($)  

(#)

  ($) 

Heintzman

  -   -   13,486   515,095 

Davis

  -   -   3,909   150,841 

Hillebrand

  -   -   7,154   269,706 

Thompson

  25,134   388,547   6,518   251,758 

Poindexter

  -   -   4,964   189,166 

SAR Exercises and Stock Vested Table

  

SAR Awards

  

Stock Awards

 
  

Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise

  

Value Realized

on Exercise

  

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting

  

Value Realized

on Vesting

 

Name

 

(#)

  ($)  

(#)

  ($) 

Hillebrand

  10,968   270,910   8,230   333,150 

Poindexter

  10,698   290,772   5,401   218,632 

Stinnett

  11,992   311,847   3,926   158,924 

Thompson

  9,089   162,693   6,363   257,574 

Dishman

  5,000   142,100   4,120   166,778 

 

 

Noncontributory Nonqualified Pension Plan

 

The purpose of the 2005 Restated Senior Officer Security Plan (the "SOSP") was to provide benefits, beginning at age 65, of $136,500 per year for 15 years for Mr. Heintzman and $82,000 per year for 15 years for Ms. Thompson, as a means to supplement theirher retirement income, after also considering expected Social Security benefits and the broad-based retirement plan applicable to Bank employees generally. The total potential benefit vests at 4% per year of service so that it is fully vested if the executive works for the Bank for a total of 25 years. At December 31, 2017, Mr. Heintzman and2020, Ms. Thompson werewas fully vested under the plan. The retirement benefit also becomes fully vested in the event of the executive's disability or a change of control of the Bank or Stock Yards Bancorp while the executive is employed by the Bank. There are no intentions to adjust the benefit payments or add additional participants to the SOSP.


 

If the executive terminates employment before age 55, SOSP benefit payments can begin as early as age 55 (or such later age as the executive has elected), but the annual payment amount will be lowered to an actuarially equivalent value.

 

Death benefits are provided in lieu of these retirement payments if the participant dies while in the employ of the Bank before age 65 or after leaving the Bank due to disability. The death benefits are provided by the Bank endorsing over to the executive, via a split dollar agreement, a right to payment of a portion of the death benefits due under several insurance policies purchased by the Bank on the executives. At December 31, 2017,2020, the SOSP provided for a $3,673,337 death benefit for Mr. Heintzman and a $1,762,805$1,096,809 death benefit for Ms. Thompson.

 

If an executive dies after employment termination (other than on account of disability) but before retirement payments begin, the executive's selected beneficiary is paid a death benefit equal to the retirement payments to which the executive would have been entitled, at the same time and in the same amounts those payments would have evenbeen paid to the executive. The following table illustrates these pension benefits.benefits.

 

 Pension Benefit Table

Pension Benefit Table

            
NamePlan Name 

Number of Years

of Credited Service

(#)

  

Present Value of
Accumulated

Benefit

($)

  

Payments
During Last

Fiscal Year

($)

 

Thompson

Senior Officers' Security Plan

  28   916,948   - 

 

Name

Plan Name

Number of Years

of Credited Service

(#)

 

Present Value of
Accumulated

Benefit

($)

 

Payments
During Last

Fiscal Year

($)

Heintzman

Senior Officers' Security Plan

33

 

1,288,620

 

-

Thompson

Senior Officers' Security Plan

25

 

721,391

 

-

47

 

Contributory Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

 

The Executive Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the "NQ Plan") allows the executive to defer receipt of and income taxes on up to 10% of base salary and 50% of annual incentive compensation. In addition, based on those deferrals, executives are credited with any match or basic ESOP contribution that they do not receive under the Bank’sBank’s KSOP applicable to employees generally, because of plan and Internal Revenue Code limits on pay that can be taken into account in calculating the qualified plan benefits. This Bank credit to the Executive’s Plan accounts is vested in accordance with the same vesting schedule as applies in the KSOP, but all executives in the Summary Compensation Table have sufficient tenure with the Bank to be 100% vested in all contributions to the NQ Plan.

 

As amounts are credited to the NQ Plan, the value of the plan will increase or decrease based on the actual investment performance of certain investment funds selected by the Company, from which the executives can designate (and re-designate as often as they wish) how their account balances should be allocated.

 

The executives have elected between a lump sum distribution or annual installments over no more than 10 years from the NQ Plan, but that election applies only if they leave the Bank's employ due to death or after age 55. If the executive's termination of employment occurs other than on account of death and prior to age 55, benefits are automatically paid in a lump sum. The NQ Plan was amended in 2014 to give executives an opportunity to designate a different payment option on future credits to that plan than applies to previous contributions.

 

The executive also may elect (prior to the year in which credits are to be made) to have some or all of their own deferrals paid to them in a lump sum or installments over up to six years, while still employed by the Bank, provided they timely designate the amount and time for that payment, and subject to Internal Revenue Code restrictions on later accelerating the payment or delaying it. Executives may also apply to receive a distribution in the event of an unforeseeable emergency.

 


 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

 

 Executive    

Registrant

  

Aggregate

  

Aggregate

  

Aggregate

 
 

Contributions

  

Contributions

  

Earnings

  

Withdrawals/

  

Balance

  

Executive Contributions

  

Registrant Contributions

  

Aggregate Earnings

  

Aggregate Withdrawals/

  

Aggregate Balance

 
 

in Last Fiscal Year

  

in Last Fiscal Year

  

in Last Fiscal Year

  

Distributions

  

at Last Fiscal Year

  

in Last Fiscal Year

  

in Last Fiscal Year

  

in Last Fiscal Year

  

Distributions

  

at Last Fiscal Year

 

Name

 ($)  ($) (2)  ($)  ($)  

End ($)

  

($)

  

($) (2)

  

($)

  

($)

  

End ($)

 
                                        

Heintzman (1)

  60,060   68,160   -   -   1,837,047 
  -   -   -   -   338,122 

Davis

  92,800   23,200   -   -   922,032 

Hillebrand (1)

  45,600   42,400   -   -   493,486   82,000   66,800   -   -   1,103,196 
  -   -   -   -   16,122   -   -   -   -   18,872 

Poindexter

  34,320   40,560   -   -   857,221 

Stinnett

  52,450   27,920   -   -   567,274 

Thompson

  30,263   36,000   -   -   790,568   31,395   35,440   -   -   814,932 

Poindexter

  21,911   26,400   -   -   344,582 

Dishman

  16,076   23,440   -   -   371,919 

 

(1)

For Messrs. Heintzman and Hillebrand, includes

Includes first an employee account, then a director fee deferral account accumulated from periods when they received directors' fees.

(2)

This is a Bank contribution to supplement the contributions that the executive does not receive under the Bank’ss tax-qualified KSOP because of plan limits or Internal Revenue Code limits.

 

Note the executive contribution includes deferral election on 2017 salary and deferral election on 2017 bonus.

Other Potential Post-EmploymentChange in Control Payments

 

The Company has no employment agreement and/or severance agreement for any named executive officer for any reason other than change in control.

Various benefit plans of the Bank have special terms that apply if a change in control occurs.

 

 

The executives' ability to exercise stock awards granted prior to 2015 is fully accelerated upon a change in control and any unvested stock-based compensation awards made prior to 2015 become 100% vested at change in control. Awards made under the terms of the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan will only vest if there is both a change in control and the executive’sexecutive's employment ends within 24 months thereafter; and

48

 

Performance Stock Units issuedIf a change in the pastcontrol occurs, PSUs are paid in shares of stock as if target performance was achieved at change in control;achieved.

Each of the executives had Change in Control Severance Agreements as of the end of 2017.

Each of the executives had Change in Control Severance Agreements as of the end of 2020. The following summarizes those agreements.

 

In the event Mr. Heintzman,Hillebrand, Mr. Poindexter or Ms. Thompson Mr. Hillebrand or Ms. Davis is terminated without "cause" or resignsresign for "good reason" (as those terms are defined in the Change in Control Severance Agreements) during negotiations or within two years following a change in control of the Bank or Stock Yards Bancorp, the Bank will pay the executive a severance payment equal to three times the sum of their highest monthly base salary during the sixthsix months prior to termination or resignation, plus the highest annual cash bonus paid to them for the current and preceding two fiscal years precedingbefore their termination or resignation. For Mr. Poindexter,Dishman and Mr. Stinnett, the same terms apply but the multiple of base salary and historical bonus will be two times.

 

Each executive with a Change in Control Severance Agreement also has a right to participate in the Bank's health plans at their cost for three (two in the case of Mr. Poindexter)Dishman and Mr. Stinnett) years following a covered severance, in addition to any existing rights under COBRA. Mr. Heintzman,Hillebrand, Mr. Poindexter, and Ms. Thompson Mr. Hillebrand and Ms. Davis are subject to an 18 month prohibition on competing with the Bank in any way within a 50 mile radius of any Bank office.office after a covered severance. All of the executives are required to maintain the confidentiality of all information regarding the business of the Bank and Bancorp and prohibited from soliciting customers or employees of the Bank for a period of 18 (12 for Mr. Poindexter)Dishman and Mr. Stinnett) months following the receipt of any severance payment.

 


Mr. Poindexter's agreement capsDishman's and Mr. Stinnett’s agreements cap the total payment plus other payments that are triggered by or enhanced due to a change in control thatif the full payment would cause the Bank to forfeit a tax deduction for some of the severance payment,payment. In that event, the severance payment is reduced to an amount no less than $1.00 below the amount which the Bank can pay without a limitation on its deduction under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and which the Mr. PoindexterDishman and Mr. Stinnett can receive without subjecting the executive to an excise tax. Section 280G, in general, denies a tax deduction for part of the compensation received in connection with a change in control, and imposes an excise tax on the recipient of such a payment, if the total paid exceeds three times an executive's five-year average W-2 reported income. For Mr. Heintzman,Hillebrand, Mr. Poindexter and Ms. Thompson, Mr. Hillebrand and Ms. Davis, rather than capping the amount paid based on Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, these agreements allow each executive to be paid the described severance amount, or an amount that is just below the Section 280G threshold, if the net amount they would receive after reduction for any excise tax they might owe, would be higher than the full amount after excise taxes are paid by them.paid. None of the agreementagreements provide for the Company to gross up amounts for taxes owed.

 

Payment under each of the Change in Control Severance Agreements is made only if the executive fully releases all claims against Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank.

 

The following table estimates the amount that would have been payable under the Change in Control Severance Agreements if their terms had been triggered as of December 31, 20172020 and other amounts that vest or accelerate if there ishad been a termination on that date related to a change in control.

Officer

 

Change in Control

Severance Agreement

(1)

  

Value Realized if Unvested

Options and Stock Awards

were Vested and Exercised

(2)

  

Total Potential

Value

 

Hillebrand

 $2,763,281  $788,535  $3,551,816 

Poindexter

  1,854,625   456,125   2,310,750 

Stinnett

  995,200   312,422   1,307,622 

Thompson

  1,596,066   377,767   1,973,833 

Dishman

  921,200   253,721   1,174,921 

(1)These are the amounts that would be paid under these agreements assuming, in the case of Messrs. Hillebrand and Poindexter, their payments are reduced for the fact that their total severance plus the additional values from equity award vesting for purposes of Code section 280G exceed the 280G cap on what can be paid without loss of a deduction or excise taxes applying. Their severance included above is $1 below such cap, because the excise tax cost to them if the higher amount is paid is projected to be higher than the reduction in severance. However, these estimates assume no reduction in parachute payment values as determined under Code Section 280G is appropriate to account for the reasonable fair value of their restrictive covenants. If their restrictive covenants are determined to have a reasonable value that is not part of the parachute payment included for Code Section 280G purposes, they could be paid severance of up to $3,300,000 and $2,112,000, respectively.

49

(2)This is the total value as of December 31, 2020 of PSUs that would become vested at the target award level (40% of maximum awards) as a result of change in control, and the difference between the base price and the current fair market value as of December 31, 2020 on unvested SARs which would have vested had a change in control occurred as of that date and the executive terminated employment. The values above do not take into account the amounts executives who leave employment after age 60 with 10 or more years of service (retirement) might receive at the end of performance cycles for awards made before retirement, based on actual performance, then prorated for the portion of the performance period worked before retirement. If, for example, performance is at or above maximum, and an executive worked 2/3rds of the performance period, the total value paid would then be more than the target values listed above which are payable if a change in control occurs. Each executive also has unexercised SARs which were vested before December 31, 2020, which would remain exercisable for a period beyond termination, the potential value of which is not included in the above chart.

 

 

Officer  

Change in Control

Severance Agreement

   

Value Realized if Unvested Options

and Stock Awards were Vested and

Exercised (1)

   

Total

Potential

Value

 

Heintzman

 $3,003,000  $1,349,406  $4,352,406 

Davis

 $1,227,000  $363,171  $1,590,171 

Thompson

 $1,599,804  $577,424  $2,177,228 

Hillebrand

 $1,968,000  $817,582  $2,785,582 

Poindexter

 $930,360  $483,892  $1,414,252 

(1)

This is the total value as of December 31, 2017 of restricted stock or restricted stock units (both performance vested and time-vested) that would become vested as a result of change in control, and the difference between the base price and the current fair market value as of December 31, 2017 on unvested Stock Appreciation Rights which would have vested had a change in control occurred as of that date and the Executive terminated employment. Each executive also has unexercised SARs which were vested before that date and would remain exercisable for a period beyond termination, the potential value of which is not included in the above chart.

CEO Pay RatioPay Ratio

 

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related SEC rules, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of David P. Heintzman,James A. Hillebrand, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) of our company:

 

For 2017,2020, our last completed fiscal year:

 

 

The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our CEO)Mr. Hillebrand) was $46,711;$56,252; and

 

The annual total compensation of our CEO was $1,459,086.$1,268,318.

 

Based on this information, for 2017,2020, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Heintzman,Hillebrand, our Chief Executive Officer, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 3123 to 1. 


 

We calculated this pay ratio in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’semployee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

 

To identify our median-compensated employee, as well as to determineWe determined the annual total compensation of our median-compensated employee by adding together all of the elements of that employee’s compensation for 2020 in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table appearing on page 41 of this Proxy Statement. That calculation included, in addition to wages, overtime and incentive payments, company contributions to the Bank’s retirement plan (including ESOP) and the taxable portion of long-term disability premiums for the median employee and our CEO, we used the following methodology:employee.

We identified eligible employees using our employee population as of December 31, 2017. We determined that, as of that date, we employed 599 individuals, all of whom were either full-time or part-time permanent employees. We did not have any temporary or seasonal employees on that date.

To determine our median-compensated employee (other than the CEO), we used annual compensation information from our payroll records for fiscal 2017. Specifically, we collected annual base salaries and wages, bonuses, commissions, incentives and overtime paid during this 12-month period. In making this determination, we annualized compensation for full-time and part-time permanent employees who were employed on December 31, 2017, but did not work for us the entire year. We did not make any adjustments to the compensation paid to part-time employees for the purpose of calculating what they would have been paid on a full-time equivalent basis.

After identifying the median employee, we added together all of the elements of that employee’s compensation for 2017 in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table appearing on page 41 of this Proxy Statement. That calculation included, in addition to wages, overtime and incentive payments, company contributions to the Bank’s retirement plan (including ESOP) and the taxable portion of long-term disability premiums for the median employee. For our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

 

This information is being provided to comply with the new disclosure requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. Neither the Compensation Committee nor our management used the pay ratio measure in making compensation decisions for our CEO or any of our other employees.

 


50

 

Director Compensation

 

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation of our non-employee directors for 2017.2020. Mr. Hillebrand and Ms. Thompson serve as directors for the Company but receive no compensation for their director service.

 

Director Compensation Table

              

Change in Pension

         
                  

Value and

         
              

Non-Equity

  

Nonqualified

         
  

Fees Earned

  

Stock

  

Option

  

Incentive Plan

  

Deferred Compensation

  

All Other

     
  

or Paid in Cash

  

Awards

  

Awards

  

Compensation

  

Earnings

  

Compensation

  

Total

 

Name

 ($) (1)  ($) (1)    ($) (1)    ($)   ($) (2)    ($) (3)    ($)  
                             

Mr. Bickel (4)

  -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Mr. Brown

  36,400   27,500   -   -   -   468   64,368 

Mr. Edinger

  59,500   27,500   -   -   -   468   87,468 

Ms. Heitzman

  39,400   27,500   -   -   -   468   67,368 

Mr. Herde

  52,300   27,500   -   -   -   468   80,268 

Mr. Lechleiter

  45,800   27,500   -   -   -   468   73,768 

Mr. Northern

  49,700   27,500   -   -   -   468   77,668 

Mr. Priebe

  40,500   27,500   -   -   -   468   68,468 

Mr. Tasman

  44,600   27,500   -   -   -   468   72,568 

Director Compensation Table

  

Fees Earned

or Paid in

Cash

  

Stock

Awards

  

Option

Awards

  

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

  

Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

  

All Other Compensation

  

Total

 

Name

 

($)

  

($) (1)

  

($)

  

($)

  

($) (2)

  

($) (3)

  

($)

 
                             

Mr. Bickel

  40,475   30,000   -   -   -   788   71,263 

Mr. Brown

  38,200   30,000   -   -   -   788   68,988 

Mr. Heintzman

  242,100(4)   30,000   -   -   -   788   272,888 

Ms. Heitzman

  47,100   30,000   -   -   -   788   77,888 

Mr. Herde

  50,400   30,000   -   -   -   788   81,188 

Mr. Lechleiter

  50,900   30,000   -   -   -   788   81,688 

Mr. Priebe

  52,300   30,000   -   -   -   788   83,088 

Mr. Schutte

  41,775   30,000   -   -   -   788   72,563 

Mr. Tasman

  51,075   30,000   -   -   -   788   81,863 

 

(1)

In January 20172020 each non-employee director then serving on the Board of Directors received a restricted stock award under the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. The number of shares granted was equal to $27,500$30,000 divided by the fair market value per share on the grant date. Based on the closing price on the grant date, each director received 585730 shares. The restricted stock awards, together with all dividend equivalents thereon, fully vest one year from the date of grant.

(2)

Each director has the option of deferring some or all of his or her fees. Investment options include Company stock and various mutual funds. Earnings on the non-employee directors' nonqualified deferred compensation balances are not included above. The investment alternatives of the nonqualified plan do not and have not offered above market rates of interest or preferential returns.

(3)(3)

Represents dividends on 20172020 restricted stock awards. Dividends are held until awards vest. As such, dividends on the shares earned in 20172020 were paid in January 2018.2021.

(4)

Mr. Bickel was appointedIncludes, in addition to the Boardsnormal cash fees paid to all non-employee directors, an annual Board fee of Directors$200,000 payable to Mr. Heintzman for his role as Chairman of Bancorp and the Bank in December 2017. He first attended Board of Directors’ meetings beginning in January 2018. Therefore he earned no director compensation in 2017.Board.

Messrs. Heintzman and Hillebrand and Ms. Thompson serve as directors for the Company but receive no compensation for their service.

 

The Compensation Committee, with advice and assistance from McLagan, its independent consultant, reviews Board compensation at least every two years. Their review of director compensation includes surveys of benchmark institutions and the related form and substance of how directors are compensated, including comparative analyses of the Company’s director compensation program relative to its peer group. For 2017,2020, non-employee directors received an annual retainer of $18,000. Stock Yards Bancorp’s directors are also directors of the Bank, and received $1,000$1,625 for each Bank board meeting attended and $1,000$1,625 for each meeting of Stock Yards Bancorp’s Board of Directors he or she attended, if the meeting was not held immediately before or after a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Bank.

 

For 2017,2020, non-employee directors of Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank who are members of the various standing committees of the Board of Directors received $1,100$1,200 per meeting of Bancorp’s Audit Committee, $800 per meeting of Bancorp’s Compensation Committee, $800 per meeting of Bancorp’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, $800$900 per meeting of the Bank’s TrustBancorp’s Risk Committee and $800 per meeting of the Bank’s RiskTrust Committee.

 


51

 

In addition, the Chairman ofof the Audit Committee received an annual retainer of $11,000, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee received an annual retainer of $7,500, the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received an annual retainer of $5,000;$5,000, the Chairman of the Risk Committee received an annual retainer of $7,500$9,000, the Chairman of the Trust Committee received an annual retainer of $5,000 and the Lead Independent Director received an annual retainer of $7,500. Annual retainers are prorated if a director serves in a position for a portion of the year.

 

Directors may defer all or a portion of their fees pursuant to the Director Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Director NQ Plan"), and the amounts so deferred then increase or decrease in value based on how the director elects that the account be allocated as among various investment options provided by the Bank. The investment options are currently the same options available under the Executive NQ Plan, except that directors may also direct that their fees be invested in Company stock, which is then actually purchased and held in trust at the Bank. At December 31, 2017,2020, approximately 9095 percent of the aggregate amounts owed directors under the Director NQ Plan were invested in the Company’s stock.

 


 

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

The Audit Committee’sCommittee’s role includes assisting the Board of Directors in monitoring the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and related reporting process, compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance, performance of the Company’s internal audit function and the business practices and ethical standards of the Company. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. Messrs. Herde, and Lechleiter and Ms. HeitzmanSchutte serve on the Committee and Messrs. Herde and Lechleiter serve as audit committee financial experts.

 

The Audit Committee reviews Stock Yards Bancorp’sBancorp’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting process. The Company’s independent auditor KPMG LLP, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and its internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and to express its opinions on the Company’s financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes. In addition, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent auditor, including review of their qualifications, independence and performance.

 

The Committee discussed with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy of Stock Yards Bancorp’sBancorp’s internal controls and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. The Committee reviewed the audit plans of both the independent and internal auditors, including audit scope and identification and evaluation of financial and related audit risks. The Committee also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations.

 

Management represented to the Audit Committee that Stock Yards Bancorp’sBancorp’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with US GAAP and the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the quarterly and year end consolidated financial statements contained in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) with management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors matters required to be discussed by the Statement onof Auditing Standards No. 1301, Communication with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

 

In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the auditorsauditors’ independence from Stock Yards Bancorp and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee also considered whether the independent auditors’ provision of non-audit services to Stock Yards Bancorp is compatible with the auditors’ independence.


 

In reliance on the reviews and discussionsdiscussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Stock Yards Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, for filing with the SEC.

 

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

 

Carl G. Herde, Chairman

Donna L. Heitzman

Richard A. Lechleiter

Stephen M. Priebe

Richard A. Lechleiter

John L. Schutte

 


 

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee selected KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and shareholders voted to ratify that selection at the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders. The Audit Committee has not yet selected a firm to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. The Committee has decided to conduct a competitive review of independent registered public accounting firms, and will be soliciting proposals from several firms to perform the audit of our financial statements as of and for the year ending December 31, 2018. Once these proposals are received and evaluated, the Audit Committee will select and engage the auditor for 2018. As a result, no recommendation concerning the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for 2018 is being presented for a vote by shareholders at the Annual Meeting.AUDITOR FEES

 

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMGthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, BKD, LLP, for the 2020 and 2019 financial statement audits of Stock Yards Bancorp’s financial statements for 2017 and 2016audit-related services provided during 2020 and fees billed for other services rendered by KPMG LLP.2019.

 

  

2017

  

2016

 

Audit fees, excluding audit related

 $440,000  $394,500 

Audit-related fees

  23,000   23,000 

All other fees

  -   - 

Total fees

 $463,000  $417,500 

  

2020

  

2019

 

Audit fees, excluding audit-related

 $417,000  $388,000 

Audit-related fees

  -   20,800 (1)

All other fees

  -   - 

Total fees

 $417,000  $408,800 

(1)

Represents agreed upon procedures performed by BKD in conjunction with the Companys acquisition of King Southern Bank in 2019.

 

Audit fees include fees for the consolidated audit and review of Form 10-K as well as fees for the reviews of quarterly financial information filed with the SEC on Form 10-Q, and FDICIA reporting. Audit-related fees of $23,000 in 2017 and$23,000 in 2016 related to the audit of compliance with requirements applicable to U.S Housing and Urban Development assisted programs.programs reporting.

 

The Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all auditing services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by its independent auditors, except forauditors. For both 20172020 and 2016, they2019, the Audit Committee pre-approved the performance of unspecified audit-related services for which fees may total up to $20,000 annually. For 2017 and 2016 noNo fees were incurred under this approval.

pre-approval authority in either 2020 or 2019.

 

TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS

 

Banking Transactions with Directors, Officers and Others

 

The Bank has had, and expects to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with certain directors and officers of Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank and their associates, as well as with corporations or organizations with which they are connected as directors, officers, shareholders or partners. These banking transactions are made on substantially the same terms including interest rates and collateral as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to the Bank or Stock Yards Bancorp. In the opinion of management of Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank, such transactions do not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. Loans made to directors and executive officers are in compliance with federal banking regulations and are thereby exempt from insider loan prohibitions included in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 


At December 31, 2017,2020, loans to directors and officers of Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank and their associates totaled $629,000$43.1 million equaling 0.2%9.8% of Bancorp’s consolidated stockholders’ equity.

 

Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions

 

Bancorp has written procedures for reviewing transactions between Bancorp and its directors and executive officers, their immediate family members and entities with which they have a position or relationship. These procedures are intended to determine whether any such related person transactions impair the independence of a director or present a conflict of interest on the part of a director or executive officer. Quarterly we require each of our directors and executive officers to complete a questionnaire listing any related person transactions. These are compiled by the internal audit department, and results are reported to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Annually we require each director and executive officer to complete a directorsdirectors’ and officers’ questionnaire that elicits information about related person transactions. Any related person transactions identified are discussed with the Audit Committee, and subsequently the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, and evaluated to determine whether any likelihood exists that the transaction could impair the director’s independence or present a conflict of interest for that director. Any such conclusion would be considered by the Board of Directors. Should it be determined a director is no longer independent, he/she would be removed from the Audit, Compensation or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee(s) as applicable. If the transaction were to present a conflict of interest, the Board would determine the appropriate response. Upon receiving notice of any transaction on the part of an executive officer that may present a conflict of interest, the Director of Internal Audit will discuss the transaction with the Chief Executive Officer or if the transaction involves the Chief Executive Officer, the Chair of the Audit Committee, to determine whether the transaction presents a conflict of interest. In a case involving a conflict of interest, the Chief Executive Officer, or Chair of the Audit Committee, along with the director of Human Resources will determine the appropriate response.

54

 

Under the oversight of thethe Audit Committee, management established a procedure under which any related person transaction or series of transactions in excess of $25,000, other than banking transactions in the ordinary course of business and in compliance with federal banking regulations, will be reported to and approved by the Audit Committee.

 

Transactions with Related Persons

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Bank may from time to time engage in non-banking transactions with other firms or entities whose officers, directors, partners or members are also directors or executive officers of Bancorp or members of their immediate families. In all cases, these transactions are conducted on an arms-length basis. There were no transactions in 20172020 with related persons involving amounts in excess of $120,000, which is the dollar threshold for disclosure under the SEC’s related person transaction rules.

 

As part of its annual assessment of director independence, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the amount and nature of any business transactions or relationships between the Bank and any companies or organizations, including charitable organizations, with which a director may be affiliated. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has determined that there are no such transactions or relationships that impair any director’sdirector’s independence or present a conflict of interest on the part of any director.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

During 20172020 Messrs. Edinger, Lechleiter, Priebe, Schutte and Tasman, all of whom are independent, non-employee directors, served on the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. None have served as an officer of Stock Yards Bancorp nor had any relationship with Stock Yards Bancorp requiring disclosure under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules regarding related persons transactions. The Compensation Committee members have no interlocking relationships requiring disclosure under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 


 

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

 

A copy of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.’s 2017s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, without exhibits, will be provided without charge following receipt of a written or oral request directed to: Nancy B. Davis,T. Clay Stinnett, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc., P.O. Box 32890, Louisville, Kentucky 40232-2890, (502) 625-9176;625-0890; or nancy.davis@syb.com.clay.stinnett@syb.com. A copy of the Form 10-K may also be obtained at the company’scompanys website, www.syb.com, or the SEC’sSECs website, www.sec.gov.

 

55

 

OTHER MATTERS

 

The officers and directors of Stock Yards Bancorp do not know of any matters to be presented for shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting other than those described in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors intends that the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy, or their substitutes, will vote such proxy as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given in their own discretion in the best interests of Stock Yards Bancorp.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

 /s/ David P. Heintzman/s/ James A. Hillebrand

  

David P. HeintzmanJames A. Hillebrand

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

Louisville, Kentucky

March 23, 2018 12, 2021

 


56

Exhibit A

Amendment No. 2
to the
Stock Yards Bancorp 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan

This is Amendment No. 2 to the Stock Yards Bancorp 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), which amendment shall be effective as of February 20, 2018, the date that it is approved by the Board of Directors of the Company (“Effective Date”).

Recitals

A.

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Plan and has reserved the right to amend the Plan from time to time, subject to the approval of the shareholders or participants for certain types of amendments.

B.

The Company desires to amend the Plan to reflect share limits after a 2016 stock split, increase the total number of shares of Company Stock subject to the Plan by 500,000 shares, and make clear that no Dividends or Dividend Equivalents on awards will vest or be paid before the related award vests.

Amendment

Now, therefore, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.     As of the Effective Date, Section 5.1 of the Plan is amended so that as amended it shall read in its entirety as follows:

5.1     Shares Authorized. Subject to adjustment as described below in Section 5.4, the total aggregate number of shares of Company Stock that may be issued or transferred under the Plan shall be the sum of the following: (i) the number of shares of Company Stock subject to outstanding grants under the 2005 Plan as of the Effective Date (reverting to shares reserved for future grant as and when described in Section 5.2 below), plus (ii) the number of shares of Company Stock remaining available for issuance under the 2005 Plan but not subject to an outstanding award and not previously exercised, vested or paid as of the Effective Date (as adjusted for the Company’s 2016 stock split), plus (iii) 500,000 shares. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Company Stock with respect to which all Grants of Incentive Stock Options may be made under the Plan shall be 450,000 shares, subject to adjustment as described below in Section 5.4.

2.     As of the Effective Date, Section 5.3 of the Plan is amended solely to reflect how the share limits contained therein apply following the Company’s 2016 stock split to read in its entirety as follows:

5.3     Individual Limits. All Grants under the Plan shall be expressed in shares of Company Stock. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Company Stock with respect to which all Grants may be made under the Plan during any calendar year to: (i) any Non-Employee Director shall be 4,500 shares via Options and SARs and 3,750 via Stock Awards or Stock Units (provided, however, that such limits do not apply to cash-based Directors fees which directors elect to have paid in Common Stock instead), and (ii) any other Participant shall be 112,500 shares, including 60,000 shares via Options and SARs and 52,500 via Stock Awards or Stock Units, in each case subject to adjustment as described in Section 5.4 below. The individual limits of this subsection (c) shall apply without regard to whether the Grants are to be paid in Company Stock or cash. All cash payments (other than with respect to Dividend Equivalents) shall equal the Fair Market Value of the shares of Company Stock to which the cash payments relate.



3.     As of the Effective Date, Section 8.5 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

8.5       Dividend Equivalents.  The Committee may grant Dividend Equivalents in connection with Stock Units, under such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate.  Dividend Equivalents awarded with respect to unvested Stock Units will be accumulated and paid to Participants at the time that such Stock Units vest, and will be forfeited in the event the underlying Stock Units are forfeited. All Dividend Equivalents shall be credited to bookkeeping accounts on the Company’s records for purposes of the Plan.  Dividend Equivalents may be accrued as a cash obligation, or may be converted to additional Stock Units for the Participant, and deferred cash Dividend Equivalents may accrue interest, all as determined by the Committee.  The Committee may provide that Dividend Equivalents shall be credited based on the achievement of specific performance goals.  Dividend Equivalents may be payable in cash or shares of Company Stock or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Committee.

4.     As of the Effective Date, Section 9.4 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

9.4     Right to Vote and to Receive Dividends.  The Committee shall determine to what extent, and under what conditions, the Participant shall have the right to vote shares of Stock Awards and to receive any dividends or other distributions paid on such shares during the restriction period, provided that no such dividends shall be paid with respect to unvested Stock Awards, including Stock Awards subject to performance goals, until and unless the related Stock Awards are vested. Dividends awarded with respect to unvested Stock Awards will be accumulated and paid to the Participant at the time that such Stock Award vests, and will be forfeited in the event the underlying Stock Award is forfeited. Dividends that are not paid currently shall be credited to bookkeeping accounts on the Company’s records for purposes of the Plan.  Dividends so accumulated may be payable in cash or shares of Company Stock or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Committee.

5.     Section 11 of the Plan is hereby amended so that as amended it shall read in its entirety as follows:

SECTION 11—OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS

The Committee may grant other awards not specified in Sections 7, 8, 9 or 10 above that are based on or measured by Company Stock to Employees or Non-Employee Directors, on such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate.  Other Stock-Based Awards may be granted subject to achievement of performance goals or other conditions and may be payable in Company Stock or cash, or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Committee in the Grant Agreement. Dividends and Dividend Equivalents may accrue with respect to unvested Other Stock-Based Awards, but will not be paid or issued until such Stock-Based Award is fully vested, the shares are issued to Participant and such shares are no longer subject to any vesting requirements or repurchase rights on behalf of the Company.

In witness whereof, a duly authorized officer of the Company has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed as of the Effective Date.

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

By:

Printed:

Title:




proxy01.jpg
 

proxy02.jpg